Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Uber drivers can now make money training AI

  Uber drivers can now make money training AI Francis Scialabba If the wait time for an Uber seems longer than usual, perhaps your driver...

Uber drivers can now make money training AI

 

If the wait time for an Uber seems longer than usual, perhaps your driver is in a parking lot uploading a Spanish-language menu as part of the new “digital tasks” program the ride-share giant announced yesterday, which pays drivers to train its AI models.

As part of a pilot program, US-based drivers who opt in will be able to earn extra money (the amount depends on the complexity) on their phones between trips by:

  • Recording audio in certain languages or accents.
  • Entering documents in different languages (The Verge reports uploading a menu is worth as much as $1).
  • Submitting specific photos.

Are drivers training their replacements? This new program is in support of Uber AI Solutions, which recently expanded its data-labeling business by purchasing Segments.ai, a Belgian startup that uses information gathered from cameras and sensors to enable autonomous driving. However, an Uber spokesperson said the data obtained from driver tasks will not be used to develop driverless vehicles.

AI data race: This move could allow Uber to become a bigger AI player and compete with companies like Scale AI, which offers similar data-collection services and received a $14 billion investment from Meta in June.

Proton Mail Review (2025)

 Proton Mail Review (2025): The Email Service You Didn’t Know You Needed | WIRED


Jacob Roach
GearOct 16, 2025 7:00 AM
Review: Proton Mail
Proton Mail gives you encrypted email, but more importantly, it puts you in the driver’s seat of your inbox.



Photograph: Jacob Roach




Rating:

8/10
Open rating explainer

WIRED
As fast and fluid as Gmail. Several options for encryption. Mass unsubscribe and filtering are simple. Email aliases. Comes as part of Proton Unlimited.
TIRED
Mobile app doesn’t have all the features of the web app. True end-to-end encryption is still clunky.


I never intended to switch away from Gmail. Like most people, I set up a free email ages ago with Google that I’ve carried through countless mailing lists and account sign-ups. My inbox is a mess, my online privacy is completely shot, and untangling my Gmail from my online life seemed impossible. But I went ahead and set up an account with Proton Mail anyway, and I haven’t opened Gmail since.

Proton Mail was founded by Proton Technologies, a privacy-focused company based in Switzerland, and it makes WIRED’s favorite VPN, Proton VPN, as well as a top-rated password manager. It shouldn’t come as a surprise, then, that Proton Mail is equally excellent, though not for the reasons you might suspect.

Like other Proton apps, Proton Mail emphasizes security and privacy, but a big feature for me is that it works for you, not against you. Automatic sorting in Gmail has left my inbox in shambles, and mishandling of my email address has left my contact information in databases I never wanted to be part of. Proton Mail is helping me clean up the mess.
Clean Start

Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

It’s tough switching to a new email service, especially when you have an email address so entrenched in your online life. Proton Mail makes the transition as seamless as possible. After signing up for an account, Proton will ask if you want to import data from Google. I imported my calendar—the encrypted Proton Calendar is included with Proton Mail, even on a free plan—and auto-forwarded my emails.




Mail

Rating: 8/10
Buy at Proton (Free)
$5 at Proton (Mail Plus, Monthly)
$13 at Proton (Unlimited, Monthly)


All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.




From a fresh inbox, messages started trickling in, and I was able to get a handle on them. First, organization. Proton gives you folders and tags, which are limited to three each on the free plan but unlimited otherwise. I tagged emails, told Proton to keep the tags consistent when new emails came from those addresses, and organized a few folders. This is standard fare for any email client, but I appreciate that Proton lets you suppress notifications on folders. I have a folder set up for emails from social platforms, for instance, where notifications are suppressed and the emails are automatically archived.

Organization is one battle, but getting my email off lists I didn’t want to be on is another. Like Gmail, you can unsubscribe from mailing lists easily. In the web client, at the top of any email that Proton has identified, you’ll see an unsubscribe button, allowing you to clean up your email without going through endless unsubscribe portals.

Proton Mail via Jacob Roach




Mail

Rating: 8/10
Buy at Proton (Free)
$5 at Proton (Mail Plus, Monthly)
$13 at Proton (Unlimited, Monthly)


All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.




Further, Proton automatically identifies these mailing lists as “newsletters” and puts them in their own view. There, you can see how many messages they’ve sent, move addresses to different folders, and unsubscribe. Proton also shows the services you’ve already unsubscribed from. After unsubscribing from probably 100 mailing lists, I had at least half a dozen companies still sending me emails. I was able to chase them down and properly get off their lists. (Gmail also recently added a system for managing subscriptions.)

The difference with Proton over other clients is that these tools are brought to the forefront. I had only five email addresses that it didn’t recognize as mailing lists. The vast majority of emails were categorized properly, and the app itself pushed me to use the tools available.
A Cozy View

Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

The look of Proton is familiar. By default, you have a list-style inbox reminiscent of Gmail, with options for standard or “compact” spacing, the latter of which will squish down each line. You can use the column layout, which moves your inbox to the left of the screen with a view for each message on the right, similar to the default Outlook view. You also get a toolbar on the right that will show your contacts and calendar, and a menu on the left that shows your labels and folders. You’ve used an interface like this before.


Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

Once you start digging around, there are some important differences. When composing an email, you’ll find a handful of buttons at the bottom of the screen. One allows you to set a password, encrypting the email to its destination regardless of the server it travels through. Another lets you set an expiration date for messages, as well as attach your public key; more on that later.

I don’t use AI writing assistants, but Proton allows you to run its writing assistant locally, which is an important distinction compared to nearly every other email service with a similar feature. Most AI features run on remote servers, so when you enter prompts with Google’s AI, for instance, those prompts and the responses are stored on Google’s servers. With Proton, you can keep that all local, no remote server involved. You’ll need a PC that meets certain system requirements, and generating text isn’t as fast as on Proton’s servers. But having the option is huge.


Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

As for reading emails, Proton goes out of its way to make things as straightforward as possible. By default, messages load in full rich text, including images. However, Proton will block images from loading if there are trackers tied to them. It will also, by default, ask for confirmation when you click a link, showing the full URL before it’s loaded. That’s important, especially on mobile devices where you can’t hover over a link to check whether an email is legitimate or a phishing attempt.

Most of the features available in the web app or on desktop are available in Proton’s mobile app, which, at the time of writing, was very recently overhauled on Android and iOS. You can bind actions to swiping left or right to quickly archive or organize messages, as well as use offline mode, which is a new addition. My only issue with the mobile app is that it doesn’t provide the same tools for unsubscribing from mailing lists. They’re completely absent, so you’ll need to handle all of that through the web or desktop app.




Mail

Rating: 8/10
Buy at Proton (Free)
$5 at Proton (Mail Plus, Monthly)
$13 at Proton (Unlimited, Monthly)


All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.




Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

You also don’t get some of the more advanced settings available in the web or desktop client. I won’t bore you with the full details, but Proton offers the usual suspects you see at other email services—forward and auto-reply, custom filters, and IMAP/SMTP settings so you can use Proton with an external desktop client like Apple Mail or Thunderbird. The main setting I want to draw attention to is your encryption keys, which you can manage within the settings, as well as export.
The Encryption Misconception

When you land on Proton Mail’s homepage, you’re greeted with this message: “Keep your conversations private with Proton Mail, an encrypted email service based in Switzerland.” It’s a good logline, but it doesn’t fully explain how Proton Mail is different other email services. Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook, and just about every other email service encrypt your messages. What makes Proton Mail different?

Your standard online email service uses Transport Layer Security for encryption. It’s what you call “in-transit” encryption, meaning that the contents of the email are encrypted only while traveling across the internet. Proton Mail uses end-to-end encryption with public-key cryptography; read our explainer on passkeys for more details on that. End-to-end encryption means that your message is fully encrypted from the source (you) to the destination (the recipient).


Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

That’s not how most popular email services work. Your emails are encrypted while traveling, but they can be (and often are) decrypted at various pitstops along the way, like the servers of the email provider you’re using. Proton Mail’s end-to-end encryption means your messages stay encrypted, and Proton doesn’t have the means to decrypt them when they travel through its servers.

At least, that’s the idea. The reality of email encryption is messier. Proton uses end-to-end encryption, but only between two Proton Mail users or if you send a message encrypted with a public PGP key. In the more likely event that there’s a non-Proton user in the exchange, Proton uses Transport Layer Security. The difference is that Proton re-encrypts emails before they hit your inbox, and it allows you to send password-protected emails. That will hide the contents of your email from the service of the recipient, behind a password, and Proton lets you set an expiration date for the message so it can’t be cracked later.


Proton Mail via Jacob Roach

This is all important context for Proton, but for my personal email use, encryption isn’t the main draw. Privacy is, and that’s an area where Proton can help, regardless of where your emails are coming from. Just like websites, emails are loaded with trackers that can swipe loads of information, from when you open an email to any links or attachments you interact with. Proton blocks these trackers, and in the top right corner of every email in the web application, you can see what trackers were blocked and where they lead back to. You’d be surprised how many trackers come in one email.

My favorite feature for Proton Mail is aliases. These are technically part of Proton Pass, but you get 10 email aliases included as part of the Proton Mail Plus subscription. (Proton Unlimited gives you unlimited aliases.) If you have the Proton Pass extension installed, you can create an alias when filling in an email field online, which will forward to your Proton Mail inbox. You’re able to see everyone who has access to that alias, as well as block senders from sending messages to it. (Apple has a similar feature with its email client.)




Mail

Rating: 8/10
Buy at Proton (Free)
$5 at Proton (Mail Plus, Monthly)
$13 at Proton (Unlimited, Monthly)


All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.




That’s very useful. So useful that I leveraged the alias feature just an hour ago at the time I’m writing this. An email from the Professional Triathletes Organization showed up in my inbox. I’ve never heard of it, much less signed up for a mailing list. It turns out another mailing list I signed up for sold my email at some point, but I used an alias! I was able to block both senders without ever touching an unsubscribe button.

Encryption and privacy measures are great, but the difference with Proton Mail is that it is working for you. You pay a subscription fee. Google and other free email providers don’t work for you. They work for themselves, selling your data and feeding you advertisements to fund a free service, at the cost of privacy.
Addressing the Controversy

Although Proton has a solid track record in its more than a decade of existence, there’s one major scar on its reputation. In 2021, a French climate activist (and Proton Mail user) was arrested, and Proton assisted in handing over their IP address to the authorities. The headlines wrote themselves, as the no-logs privacy company not only logged the data of a user but also shared that data with authorities. There’s some critical nuance to this story, however.

Proton is based in Switzerland, and as a Swiss company, it isn’t allowed to share data with foreign governments or entities. That includes France and Europol. In this instance, Proton says it received a legally binding order from the Swiss government to log this user’s IP address. As the Proton Mail threat model page states, “the internet is generally not anonymous, and if you are breaking Swiss law, a law-abiding company such as Proton Mail can be legally compelled to log your IP address.”




Mail

Rating: 8/10
Buy at Proton (Free)
$5 at Proton (Mail Plus, Monthly)
$13 at Proton (Unlimited, Monthly)


All products featured on WIRED are independently selected by our editors. However, we may receive compensation from retailers and/or from purchases of products through these links. Learn more.




In this case, Proton did log the IP address after an order from the Swiss government, but it didn’t provide any contents of the email address in question because, as the security model suggests, Proton couldn’t decrypt them. Further, a month later, Proton won a case in Swiss courts to limit required data retention on email providers, and it pointed activists looking for anonymity toward Tor to access Proton.

It’s not a good look for a company that prides itself on privacy to hand over data to the government, even if that data is ultimately inconsequential. Proton says the authorities already knew the identity of the user, and it speculates that they were looking for further incriminating evidence within emails. However, Proton’s response to this situation is just as important. Contrast this situation with something like the LastPass data breach a few years ago. Proton acted with transparency.

I’m a believer that perfect is the enemy of good, and that sentiment reigns with Proton Mail. It is leaps and bounds more private to use Proton Mail than a service like Gmail or Outlook, and although the company landed in at least one controversy, it doesn’t have a track record of mishandling user data or lying about it.

Proton Mail makes privacy easy, and that's what I love so much about it. The reality of true end-to-end encryption is clunky, and the implications of a private email service aren't relevant for a lot of users. But Proton Mail gives me at least a bit more control over my inbox, and after decades of siphoning my data out to the highest bidder without my knowledge, it's a breath of fresh air.

Russell Vought is the tool of a dangerous elite

Russell Vought is the tool of a dangerous elite

Russell Vought is the tool of a dangerous elite
He wields his budget hammer not in service to the people or the Constitution, but for the billionaire class.
Oct 13, 2025




Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought at a Sept. 29 news conference. (C-SPAN)

By Sheldon Whitehouse

In ordinary times, Americans go about their daily lives without much worry about who is running the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), a powerful, low-profile agency tasked with executing the federal budget.

These are not ordinary times.

President Donald Trump’s OMB director is Russell Vought. You might have seen Vought in one of Trump’s crazed AI videos, portrayed as the government’s grim reaper, gleefully wielding a scythe in the Trump shutdown. Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said of Vought’s plans to use the shutdown to fire more federal workers, this is what Vought has been “dreaming about—and meticulously preparing for—[…] since puberty.” Not a normal guy.

On Friday, Vought began implementing his plan to fire those furloughed federal workers, beginning with about 4,100 people, including about 600 at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and 1,400 at Treasury.

Vought is an extremist; a tool of creepy billionaires in the corporate takeover of the U.S. government; and he seems to get unhealthy pleasure from depriving Americans of the government services their tax dollars are supposed to fund.

Let’s start with a little history on Vought’s lawlessness. Vought served at OMB during the first Trump administration. Back then, he violated the Impoundment Control Act—the law requiring the executive branch to spend the funds Congress appropriates—by withholding (“impounding”) hundreds of millions of dollars in aid from the heroic Ukrainian soldiers fighting back against Russia’s “little green men” invasion. That “dirt-for-dollars” scandal was at the center of Trump’s first impeachment.

Now in Trump’s second term, Vought wields OMB as a hammer to break the power of Congress and create executive supremacy. Before Vought’s confirmation this year, he said, “If I am confirmed as OMB Director, I will follow the advice of OMB General Counsel, and ultimately the President” on the Impoundment Control Act. He did not say he would follow the law established by Congress. He did not say he would follow court decisions. Just his legal counsel and his lawbreaking president.

So, let’s look at who Vought’s legal counsel is. Remember when billionaire Harlan Crow commissioned a now-infamous painting? That painting is basically a panorama of the Supreme Court’s corruption: the billionaire who funded it (Crow), the justice who secretly accepted hundreds of thousands of dollars in billionaire gifts (Justice Clarence Thomas), the guy who implemented the scheme and travels with justices on billionaire-funded trips (Leonard Leo), and a sidekick who defends the justices from any criticism of their “Billionaire Gifts Program.” The sidekick in the billionaire court-capture panorama is Mark Paoletta, now Vought’s legal counsel. Paoletta has said the Impoundment Control Act is a stupid law, and tweeted at Vought: “Impound, baby, impound.”

Like Paoletta, Vought is a creature of the far-right, billionaire dark-money operation that captured the Supreme Court. Before he went to OMB the first time, he was vice president at Heritage Action, a billionaire-funded dark-money group advocating for things that dark-money billionaires want. He’s mostly still working for them, just at taxpayer expense now.

After Trump lost in 2020, Vought set up an outfit called the Center for Renewing America—another billionaire-funded, dark-money front advocating for things dark-money billionaires want. “Senior fellows” at his center included Paoletta and Kash Patel, the guy now busy turning the FBI into a political weapon for Trump.

At the Center for Renewing America, Vought was a key author of Project 2025, the dark-money-funded playbook to loot the American government for billionaires and big polluters. Yes, the one Trump pretended not to know about. Now Vought is at OMB implementing that plan. In the Trump regime, you see Project 2025 playing out again and again. Take, for one example, the administration’s dirty work to kneecap clean energy for the big fossil fuel companies that prop up Republican campaigns and gave Trump hundreds of millions. Look at how Vought decapitated the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the agency that had returned over $21 billion to Americans cheated by giant companies, created by Congress specifically to protect consumers after the 2008 financial crisis.

Vought’s Project 2025 scheme is to destroy all independent government agencies. Agencies like the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission require independence from direct executive branch political control to serve the public. These agencies shield Americans from corporate exploitation, protect consumers and ensure a functioning economy. Vought has said, “What we’re trying to do is identify the pockets of independence and seize them.” Seizing the independent agencies of government lets him put them under the political control of the big corporate donors who paid to put the regime in power and makes Trump the gatekeeper of political control.

Billionaire stoogery aside, Vought is a bit strange. He said about the men and women who work in the federal government: “We want them to be traumatically affected. When they wake up in the morning, we want them to not want to go to work because they are increasingly viewed as the villains.” Your postman, a villain; the meat inspector who makes your steak safe at the USDA, a villain; the scientists who do brain cancer research, villains—according to Vought. Not normal.

Vought wants to replace government experts with toadies who can’t or won’t stand up to big corporations and polluters. He has begun mass firings of the civil servants who keep this country running—and threatened worse. Now, he’s saying that federal workers furloughed through no fault of their own aren’t guaranteed back pay after the government shutdown, despite a law that clearly says they are. Intimidation of the federal workforce, to make it compliant to political pressure from big corporate powers, is his goal. To actuate that political pressure, the big corporate powers will have to go to Trump, and Trump can then demand corrupt tribute for himself and his family. It’s a racket in the making.

Like a clever commissar for a dictator, or the plotting vizier of a sultan, Vought is a dangerous figure. This is not a guy who respects the law and the Constitution. This guy is the tool of a very small, very creepy, right-wing billionaire elite. Vought belongs to the looters and polluters, and he is manipulating our government for their benefit, setting us up for ever worse corruption.

Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat, represents Rhode Island in the U.S. Senate.



The Contrarian is reader-supported. To receive new posts, enable our work, help with litigation efforts, and keep this opposition movement alive and engaged, please consider joining the fight by becoming a paid subscriber.

Subscribe

UK investment platform warns traders to avoid bitcoin, crypto

UK investment platform warns traders to avoid bitcoin, crypto

CHONGQING, CHINA - JULY 17: In this photo illustration, a person holds a physical representation of a Bitcoin (BTC) coin in front of a screen displaying a candlestick chart of Bitcoin’s latest price movements on July 17, 2025 in Chongqing, China. (Photo illustration by Cheng Xin/Getty Images)
Cheng Xin | Getty Images News | Getty Images


A major trading platform in the U.K. has issued a stark warning to investors hoping to cash in on relaxed crypto rules: cryptocurrencies should not be in your portfolio.

A longstanding U.K. ban on retail investors being able to access crypto exchange-traded notes (ETNs) was lifted on Oct. 8. Exchange-traded notes are debt instruments linked to one or more specified assets. In this case, they give traders exposure to digital tokens through the use of a regulated exchange.


The new rules sparked a warning from Hargreaves Lansdowne — the U.K.’s biggest retail investment platform — which urged British retail investors to be cautious.

“The HL Investment view is that bitcoin is not an asset class, and we do not think cryptocurrency has characteristics that mean it should be included in portfolios for growth or income and shouldn’t be relied upon to help clients meet their financial goals,” Hargreaves Lansdowne said in a statement.

“Performance assumptions are not possible to analyse for crypto, and unlike other alternative asset classes it has no intrinsic value.”

When U.K. officials announced earlier this year that the ETN ban would be overturned, they argued the move would support “the growth and competitiveness of the U.K.’s crypto industry.” It was hailed by crypto firms as a major breakthrough for the sector in Britain.

The government also ruled on Wednesday that investors will be able to hold crypto ETNs in stocks and shares ISA accounts, an account where up to £20,000 ($26,753) a year can be invested tax-free.

Big gains, and big losses


Cryptocurrencies, which are decentralized and therefore not regulated by central authorities like governments, have their critics and prices are notoriously volatile. In 2022, a so-called “crypto wintersaw investors lose $2 trillion. Bitcoin — the most commonly traded cryptocurrency — has led to major returns for early investors, however, and was last seen trading around $121,508.

The Hitler Youth

 The Hitler Youth (German: Hitlerjugend[ˈhɪtlɐˌjuːɡn̩t], often abbreviated as HJ,[haːˈjɔt]) was the youth wing of the German Nazi Party. Its origins date back to 1922 and it received the nameHitler-Jugend, Bund deutscher Arbeiterjugend("Hitler Youth, League of German Worker Youth") in July 1926. From 1936 until 1945, it was the sole official boys' youth organisation in Germany (although the League of German Girls was a wing of it) and it was partially a paramilitary organisation. It was composed of the Hitler Youth proper for male youths aged 14 to 18, and the German Youngsters in the Hitler Youth (Deutsches Jungvolk in der Hitler Jugendor "DJ", also "DJV") for younger boys aged 10 to 13.

With the surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945, the organisation de facto ceased to exist. On 10 October 1945, the Hitler Youth and its subordinate units were outlawed by the Allied Control Council along with other Nazi Party organisations. Under Section 86 of the Criminal Code of the Federal Republic of Germany, the Hitler Youth is an "unconstitutional organisation" and the distribution or public use of its symbols, except for educational or research purposes, is illegal.

Bari Weiss, CBS News, and the Triumph of Faux Balance

Bari Weiss, CBS News, and the Triumph of Faux Balance
(Composite by Hannah Yoest / Photos: GettyImages / Shutterstock)

MONDAY MORNING BROUGHT a long-anticipated announcement: The Free Press, the web publication started by Bari Weiss in 2021, has been acquired by Paramount, and Weiss herself has been made the editor-in-chief of Paramount’s CBS News.

Discussing the reported $150 million purchase in a statement, the chairman and CEO of Paramount, billionaire tech scion David Ellison, called the Free Press “one of the most dynamic news organizations in the country.”

Weiss, in her own message to her new CBS News colleagues, said that she wants to help the network news division focus on journalism that holds both political parties “to equal scrutiny,” and that “embraces a wide spectrum of views and voices.” At the Free Press, which she says “will remain independent” within Paramount, she wrote an editorial reiterating these themes.

But now that the deal is sealed, what will Paramount be getting for its money? Does the actual record of the Free Press show fidelity to the principles Ellison and Weiss proclaim? And as Weiss—who has no experience working in network TV, and whose video products have not particularly thrived—steps into her new role at CBS News, what can we expect based on her leadership at her own media project?

The outlook is not great. While the Free Press has published some undeniably high-quality work and platformed interesting voices, its position as a fellow traveler of the right in the culture wars has increasingly come at the expense of its stated goals: journalistic independence, open-mindedness, intrepid truth-seeking, upholding a commitment to liberal values. What’s more, Weiss’s triumph is owed, at least in part, to a president’s abuse of power to trample those values and strong-arm his critics. One would expect that someone who holds true to core journalistic principles would have spoken out against those tactics. The Free Press has largely remained silent.

From independent dissident to fellow traveler of the right

I speak as someone who, a few years ago, was unabashedly Team Bari. I wrote several sympathetic articles about Weiss, taking her side against what I thought, and still think, was unfair and over-the-top hostility generated by her status as a right-of-center pundit at the New York Times, and often manifesting itself in Twitter pile-ons based on uncharitable readings of innocuous statements.1 (I should add, by way of full disclosure, that Weiss and I briefly met a few times and interacted cordially on Twitter, and that she shepherded two of my articles as an editor at the Wall Street Journal and at the New York Times in 2017 and 2018.)

I was sympathetic when Weiss resigned from her Times job in July 2020 after the ouster of editorial page editor James Bennet—despite some reservations when a journalist from Weiss’s own center-right side, the late Sol Sternreported that she was extremely cagey when asked for specifics of either the bullying or the censorship she said she had endured. Stern also took Weiss to task for failing to push back when MAGA activists, and Donald Trump himself, weaponized her critique of the Times as a talking point against “Fake News.” Nonetheless, he concluded by wishing Weiss well in her next foray into “journalism ‘without fear or favor,’” a position I was glad to second.

Weiss had been, to that point, a true independent. While her criticism usually punched left, she was willing to challenge critics of the illiberal left who had little to say about the sins of the right.2 Her August 2017 New York Times column about the hijacking of the Women’s March by far-left radicals acknowledged that “the nightmare of the Trump administration” was by far the bigger story (which, she argued, made it all the more essential for the opposition to avoid big missteps). And in November of that year, Weiss wrote a hard-hitting piece about the threat Trumpism posed to conservative think tanks and magazines. Discussing Sol Stern’s departure from one such publication, City Journal, Weiss quoted from his resignation letter assailing “the magazine’s intellectual abdication on the most urgent crisis facing the nation today: the election of an unfit, dangerous man to the presidency, plus the myriad ways in which the forces of Trumpism . . . are tearing the country apart.”

Eight years later, these critiques read like a prescient description of Weiss’s own media venture at a time when the same man in the White House is even more unfit and dangerous, the “forces of Trumpism” are even more extreme, and “the nightmare of the Trump administration” this time around makes the first version seem almost normal.