Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Our House Was a Very, Very, Very Fine House

Our House Was a Very, Very, Very Fine House Trump views the physical history of the White House much as he views the nation’s laws: somethi...

Letters from an American - Heather Cox Richardson

 

Stocks were up early today as traders put their hopes in Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s suggestion that the Trump administration was open to negotiations for lowering Trump’s proposed tariffs. But then U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said there would not be exemptions from the tariffs for individual products or companies, and President Donald J. Trump said he was going forward with 104% tariffs on China, effective at 12:01 am on Wednesday.

Markets fell again. By the end of the day, the Dow Jones Industrial Average had fallen by another 320 points, or 0.8%, a 52-week low. The S&P 500 fell 1.6% and the Nasdaq Composite fell 2.2%.

Rob Copeland, Maureen Farrell, and Lauren Hirsch of the New York Times reported today that over the weekend, Wall Street billionaires tried desperately and unsuccessfully to change Trump’s mind on tariffs. This week they have begun to go public, calling out what they call the “stupidity” of the new measures. These industry leaders, the reporters write, did not expect Trump to place such high tariffs on so many products and are shocked to find themselves outside the corridors of power where the tariff decisions have been made.

Elon Musk is one of the people Trump is ignoring to side with Peter Navarro, his senior counselor for trade and manufacturing. Navarro went to prison for refusing to answer a congressional subpoena for information regarding Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election. Since Musk poured $290 million into getting Trump elected in 2024 and then burst into the news with his “Department of Government Efficiency,” he has seemed to be in control of the administration. But he has stolen the limelight from Trump, and it appears Trump’s patience with him might be wearing thin.

Elizabeth Dwoskin, Faiz Siddiqui, Pranshu Verma, and Trisha Thadani of the Washington Post reported today that Musk was among those who worked over the weekend to get Trump to end his new tariffs. When Musk failed to change the president’s mind, he took to social media to attack Navarro personally, saying the trade advisor is “truly a moron,” and “dumber than a sack of bricks.”

Asked about the public fight between two of Trump’s advisors—two of the most powerful men in the world—White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters: “Boys will be boys.”

Business interests hard hit by the proposed tariffs are less inclined to dismiss the men in the administration as madcap kids. They are certainly not letting Musk shift the blame for the economic crisis off Trump and onto Navarro. The right-wing New Civil Liberties Alliance, which is backed by billionaire Republican donor Charles Koch, has filed a lawsuit claiming that Trump’s tariffs against China are not permitted under the law. It argues that the president’s claim that he can impose sweeping tariffs by using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is misguided. It notes that the Constitution gives to Congress, not the president, the power to levy tariffs.

With Trump’s extraordinary tariffs now threatening the global economy, some of those who once cheered on his dictatorial impulses are now recalling the checks and balances they were previously willing to undermine.

Today the editors of the right-wing National Review urged Congress to take back the power it has ceded to Trump, calling it “preposterous that a single person could enjoy this much power over…the global economy.” They decried the ”raw chaos” of the last week that has made it impossible for any business to plan for the future.

“What has happened since last Thursday is hard to fathom,” they write. “Based on an ever-shifting series of rationales, characterized by an embarrassing methodology, and punctuated with an extraordinary arrogance toward the country’s constitutional order, the Trump administration has alienated our global allies, discombobulated our domestic businesses, decimated our capital markets, and increased the likelihood of serious recession.” While this should worry all Americans, they write, Republicans in particular should remember that in less than two years, they “will be judged in large part on whether the president who shares their brand has done a good job.”

“No free man wants to be at the mercy of a king,” they write.

Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) told the Senate yesterday: “I don’t care if the president is a Republican or a Democrat. I don’t want to live under emergency rule. I don’t want to live where my representatives cannot speak for me and have a check and balance on power.”

Adam Cancryn and Myah Ward reported in Politico today that Republican leaders are worried about Trump’s voters abandoning him as prices go up and their savings and jobs disappear. After all, voters elected Trump at least in part because he promised to lower inflation and spur the economy. “It’s a question of what the pain threshold is for the American people and the Republican voters,” one of Trump’s economic advisors told the reporters. “We’ve all lost a lot of money.”

MAGA influencers have begun to talk of the tariffs as a way to make the United States “manly” again, by bringing old-time manufacturing and mining back to the U.S. Writer Rotimi Adeoye today noted MAGA’s glorification of physical labor as a sort of moral purification. Adeoye points out how MAGA performs an identity that fetishizes “rural life, manual labor, and a kind of fake rugged masculinity.” That image—and the tradwife image that complements it—recalls an imagined American past. In reality, the 1960s manufacturing economy MAGA influencers appear to be celebrating depended on high rates of unionization and taxation, and on government investing heavily in infrastructure, including healthcare and education.

Adeoye notes that Trump is marketing the image of a world in which ordinary workers had a shot at prosperity, but his tariffs will not bring that world back.

In a larger sense, Trump’s undermining of the global economy reflects forty years of Republican emphasis on the myth that a true American man is an individual who operates outside the community, needs nothing from the government, and asserts his will by dominating others.

Associated with the American cowboy, that myth became central to the culture of Reagan’s America as a way for Republican politicians to convince voters to support the destruction of federal government programs that benefited them. Over time, those embracing that individualist vision came to dismiss all government policies that promoted social cooperation, whether at home or abroad, replacing that cooperation with the idea that strong men should dominate society, ordering it as they thought best.

The Trump administration has taken that idea to an extreme, gutting the U.S. government and centering power in the president, while also pulling the U.S. out of the web of international organizations that have stabilized the globe since World War II. In place of that cooperation, the Trump administration wants to invest $1 trillion in the military. It is not just exercising dominance over others, it is reveling in that dominance, especially over the migrants it has sent to prison in El Salvador. It has shown films of them being transported in chains and has displayed caged prisoners behind Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who was wearing a $50,000 gold Rolex watch.

Now Trump is demonstrating his power over the global economy, rejecting the conviction of past American leaders that true power and prosperity rest in cooperation. Trump has always seen power as a zero-sum game in which for one party to win, others must lose, so he appears incapable of understanding that global trade does not mean the U.S. is getting “ripped off.” Now he appears unconcerned that other countries could work together against the U.S. and seems to assume they will have to do what he says.

We’ll see.

For his part, Trump appears to be enjoying that he is now undoubtedly the center of attention. Asked to make “dinner remarks” at the National Republican Congressional Committee tonight, he spoke for close to two hours. Discussing the tariffs, he delivered a story with the “sir” marker that indicates the story is false: “These countries are calling us up. Kissing my ass,” he told the audience. “They are dying to make a deal. “Please, please, sir, make a deal. I’ll do anything. I’ll do anything, sir. And then I’ll see some rebel Republican, you know, some guy that wants to grandstand, saying: ‘I think that Congress should take over negotiations.’ Let me tell you: you don’t negotiate like I negotiate.”

Trump also told the audience that "I really think we're helped a lot by the tariff situation that’s going on, which is a good situation, not a bad. It's great. It’s going to be legendary, you watch. Legendary in a positive way, I have to say. It’s gonna be legendary.”

Eye surgeons turn to teeth in astonishing vision treatments

Eye surgeons turn to teeth in astonishing vision treatments

Eye surgeons turn to teeth in astonishing vision treatments

As science-fiction-y as it sounds, tooth-in-eye surgery has proven to be effective in dozens of cases over the last six decades
As science-fiction-y as it sounds, tooth-in-eye surgery has proven to be effective in dozens of cases over the last six decades
VIEW 2 IMAGES

A surgical procedure to restore the power of sight to blind patients using their teeth is slowly gaining traction around the world, with Canada opening its first clinic for this treatment.

It's called Osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis (OOKP), and it's actually not all that new. In fact, it was pioneered more than 60 years ago in Italy by ophthalmic surgeon Benedetto Strampelli. This procedure has been carried out dozens of times in a handful of countries over the last few decades, and Canada now has three patients who've undergone the first part of their two-stage OOKP surgery.

Laser-Based Internet

 

Laser-Based Internet

Google parent Alphabet will spin off its laser-based internet startup into an independent company, according to reports yesterday. Known as Taara, the firm is anticipated to compete directly with SpaceX's Starlink as a means of providing high-quality internet access to hard-to-reach locations. 

 

Starlink, which currently serves an estimated 5 million users across 100 nations and territories, uses a network of thousands of satellites to connect users to high-speed broadband. Taara's approach relies on a land-based system of lasers beaming information back and forth to each other (watch overview). While each approach has pros and cons—laser networks don't need to be launched into space but can be blocked if an object gets in the way—company engineers say they can transmit 20 gigabytes of information per second across more than 10 miles. 

 

Alphabet says the company will begin by focusing on helping established telecom firms extend existing networks. See a deep dive into Alphabet's (Google's) history here

Europe moves to cut SpaceX reliance with Ariane 6 launch

Europe moves to cut SpaceX reliance with Ariane 6 launch


Europe’s space launch industry reopened for business today when the Ariane 6 heavy rocket lifted off at 17:24 CET from a spaceport in French Guiana. Originally scheduled for December, the Ariane 6 mission was delayed first to February 26 and subsequently to March 3 due to issues in transporting the satellite to the launchpad. However, just minutes before Monday’s launch, engineers identified an “anomaly” in one of the refuelling pipes, postponing the launch further. Finally, Ariane 6 had its first successful commercial launch today. The milestone came seven months after the rocket’s maiden flight, which restored sovereign access to space for Europe. …This story continues at The Next Web
Or just read more coverage about: SpaceX

Elon Musk’s MAGA role opens doors for European rivals to Starlink

Elon Musk’s MAGA role opens doors for European rivals to Starlink

As Elon Musk was saluting Donald Trump in the US Congress yesterday, the South African’s divisive politics were opening new doors to his business rivals in Europe. Musk’s role in the White House had already been linked to Tesla sales and stock tanking. Now, the repercussions appear to have spread to SpaceX. The fallout centres on the company’s Starlink satellite internet service. The network has provided a vital communications system to Ukraine’s military since Russia’s full-scale invasion began in 2022. But concerns are now growing that the service could soon be disrupted. According to Reuters, US officials recently raised the…This story continues at The Next Web

Purdue Pharma files new bankruptcy plan for $7.4 billion opioid settlement | Reuters

Purdue Pharma files new bankruptcy plan for $7.4 billion opioid settlement | Reuters
  • Sacklers to contribute $6.5-$7 billion
  • Widespread creditor support expected
  • New plan fleshes out details about how money will be allocated
NEW YORK, March 19 (Reuters) - Bankrupt drugmaker Purdue Pharma filed a new bankruptcy plan on Tuesday, a major step towards finalizing a proposed opioid settlement of at least $7.4 billion after a setback in the U.S. Supreme Court last year.
The payments are aimed at resolving thousands of lawsuits alleging that the company's pain medication OxyContin caused a widespread opioid addiction crisis in the United States. The headline figure had been previously flagged by Purdue and its owners, members of the wealthy Sackler family.


Saamis Solar Park proposal was recently sold to Medicine Hat

 Canada to Build One of the Largest Urban Solar Power Plant Projects in North America - EcoWatch

A new, utility-scale solar power plant proposed for a 1,600-acre site in Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada is expected to be one of the largest urban solar power projects in all of North America.

The 325 megawatt (MW) Saamis Solar Park proposal was recently sold to Medicine Hat, as Mother Jones reported. The project, developed by DP Energy, is slated for a brownfield site with otherwise limited development potential, as it contains a capped phosphogypsum stack. 

As explained by the Center for Biological Diversity, phosphogypsum is a radioactive substance leftover from the processing of phosphate ore into phosphoric acid, which is a common fertilizer ingredient. Leftover phosphogypsum is often disposed of by stacking the waste, then covering it with soil to minimize radon exposure, as phosphogypsum can form radon as it decays.

“Not only is it a productive use of a large area of contaminated land with limited development potential, it now also has the potential to contribute to the city’s energy transition to clean, renewable power,” Damian Bettles, DP Energy’s North America head of development, told Canada’s National Observer.

RG Richardson Interactive Glossary

 The RG Richardson Interactive Glossary- Multi-language. This is all about no more typing with over 9900 preset searches for your browser! These guides never go out of date due to the power of the internet! Translate in your language through your browser. You can now avoid spelling mistakes and language difficulties making the guide simple enough for even those with learning disabilities to use. 

Available on Kobo, Rakuten and Amazon.



New Chinese EVs will charge in 5 minutes

 

BYD

Costfoto/Getty Images

China’s top EV-maker says its newest cars will charge faster than the average time it takes to decide on a Takis flavor at the rest stop.

BYD announced it developed chargers that will allow its newest models to fully charge in as little as five minutes (for 250 miles of range). By comparison, the fastest-charging Teslas take at least 15 minutes to get 200 miles’ worth of juice.

The company plans to start shipping two five-minute-charge models next month and install 4,000 of the new Super e-Platform chargers across China.

Tesla trouble

BYDs with refueling time comparable to a gas-guzzler will rub salt in the wound for Tesla, which is getting schooled in China by domestic EVs that are cheaper and increasingly high-tech.

Of the EVs sold there in January:

  • 27% were BYD-produced, while only 4.5% were Teslas, putting Elon Musk’s company at No. 6 by EV market share in the country.
  • Tesla’s 2024 China sales were down 19% year over year.

Shares of Tesla have plunged 44% since the year began, and analysts expect its global sales to stagnate in 2025. Meanwhile, news of five-minute chargers powered BYD’s stock listed in Hong Kong to a record high yesterday. 

It’s not just China…as BYD is also capturing Latin America’s fledgling EV market, more than tripling its Brazil sales last year.—SK

Fossil Fuel Giants Walk Back

 

Fossil Fuel Giants Walk Back Climate Pledges, Universities Keep Taking Their Cash

Universities pride themselves on being engines of progress, knowledge, and public good—and students are increasingly drawn to institutions with strong sustainability commitments. Many universities publicly tout their fossil fuel divestment, but when it comes to the funding they receive from the industry, they remain conspicuously silent.

In Canada, fossil fuel interests have influenced research priorities through government funding mechanisms that favour industry-aligned projects. Our research examines how institutions and media in the United Kingdom and the United States respond when fossil fuel companies fund higher education, revealing a troubling disconnect: While public discourse increasingly recognizes the problematic influence of fossil fuel funding in academia, university policies remain vague and inadequate in addressing these concerns.

These findings come at a critical moment when the business model of British higher education is broken, a reality becoming apparent as universities struggle with financial pressures while pursuing their core missions of education, research, and public service. As institutions seek new revenue sources in a financial vacuum, many rely on partnerships with the fossil fuel industry, despite the ethical and environmental considerations.

Fossil Fuel Funding Affects Policy

In Europe, universities received more than €260 million (around C$404 million) from fossil fuel companies between 2016 and 2023. UK institutions alone accepted €170 million (around C$264 million) for research, tuition fees and grants, with oil and gas giant Shell contributing €62 million (around C$96 million). The parallels to the tobacco industry’s historical efforts to influence health research are striking.

Financial ties between industry and higher education profoundly impact climate policy development. When fossil fuel funding determines research priorities, it shapes the evidence base for policy decisions, often emphasizing non-transformative solutions rather than systemic change. For example, research centres that accept funding from the gas industry are more likely to downplay the role renewable energy sources might play in the energy transition.

In Canada, the fossil fuel industry also indirectly shapes research across the country by influencing government research-funding priorities. Between 1999 and 2016, federally-funded energy or environmental science researchers at the Universities of Alberta and Calgary conducted far more (52%) fossil fuel-related research—e.g., reservoir exploration, hydraulic fracturing—compared to 15% working on renewable energy, biofuels, or energy efficiency combined.

The ethical breach is widened when fossil fuel companies walk back their climate commitments. BP recently shifted strategies to increase its annual investment in oil and gas to $10 billion, while slashing more than $5 billion from its green investment plan—a sign that profit, not climate action, remains the industry’s priority.

Students Demand Ethical Research

Students care about these contradictions. The 2022 QS Student Pulse Survey found that 79% of students place high importance on universities taking action to minimize their environmental impact. Over 43% of students interested in studying in the UK actively research [pdf] universities’ sustainability plans as part of their decision-making process.

Universities cannot claim to serve these students while accepting funding from the fossil fuel industry. Our analysis of policy documents from across eight Ivy League universities in the U.S. and 24 Russell Group universities in the UK reveals that both systems fail to address how industry funding distorts climate research and policy and both lack adequate policies to prevent this distortion.

A Crossroads: The University Funding Crisis Meets the Fossil Free Research Movement

The funding crisis in British higher education is nearing a precipice just as the Fossil Free Research (FFR) movement is emerging. Building on the success of campaigns that saw more than 1,600 institutions globally commit to divesting around $40 trillion from fossil fuel companies, the FFR movement is calling for universities to reject research funding from these companies altogether—to protect their intellectual integrity.

Led by students, academics, and climate justice advocates since 2022, the movement is becoming visible in Canada, with many students calling on their universities to reject fossil fuel funding and researchers publishing open letters to the same effect.

A Path Forward: Ethical Funding and Institutional Integrity

University leaders must think outside the box to manage the tension between competing imperatives, finding new markets and service models while continuing to meet their mandate for progress.

We recommend they establish clear guidelines for accepting any industry funding, and instate robust conflict-of-interest protocols and transparency mechanisms that disclose all funding sources. Universities must develop ethical frameworks that evaluate potential partnerships against climate commitments and support and prioritize alternative funding sources for climate and sustainability research.

The University of Cambridge, has taken steps in this direction with its recent decision to temporarily halt fossil fuel donations after an independent report highlighted “high reputational risk” and due diligence failures. This represents an important development, but Cambridge remains an outlier in a sector that continues to accept fossil fuel money without safeguards or transparency. As BP doubles down on fossil fuels, universities maintaining these partnerships are complicit in climate delay. If higher education is to remain a force for progress, it must break free from fossil fuel influence and chart a new, ethical funding path.

Camilla Ceccon is an MSc Corporate Sustainability and Environmental Management graduate from the University of York. Truzaar Dordi is an assistant professor in sustainability management at the University of York.

Canadians can’t afford to relax barriers to foreign entry in their banking system

Canadians can’t afford to relax barriers to foreign entry in their banking system The Bank of Canada's head office seen in 2019. Capitulating to U.S. pressure could push Canada toward a more deregulated financial environment. (Bank of Canada/Flickr) United States President Donald Trump has made calls to ease Canadian regulatory barriers on foreign-owned banks. His criticism highlights a recurring, but often overlooked, threat to Canada: monetary sovereignty. Alongside his material threats to use economic force to annex Canada, Trump’s repeated grievance raises concerns about Canada’s ability to maintain control over its financial system at a time when such control is crucial. U.S. pressure on Canada’s banks Over the past 50 years, Canada has maintained an exceptionally domesticated financial sector, despite repeated attempts by U.S. banks to weaken its regulatory barriers. Canada’s longstanding rule prohibiting foreign ownership of large Canadian banks is one rooted in concerns about U.S. corporate takeovers amid growing economic integration between the two countries. Since the 1980s, American pressure to remove these barriers has led to several regulatory breaks modelled after U.S. banking laws. In one notable instance, pressure from the U.S. Treasury resulted in Canada lowering federal restrictions on foreign bank subsidiaries. U.S. negotiators have since pushed for full branching rights, which would allow American banks to operate in Canada with less effective regulatory control on their Canadian market operations than is currently the case. Some critics view this as an attempt to impose U.S. banking laws on Canadian soil. Unlike subsidiaries, a foreign branch’s parent company retains administrative control over cross-border investment decisions. In today’s geopolitical climate, relaxing these restrictions could lead to the de facto takeover of Canada’s financial system by U.S. entities, with significant implications for the country’s economic policy. Canada’s financial stability at risk Canada’s chartered banks are key issuers of Canadian dollars; their privileges depend on government regulatory approval. A sudden increase in foreign ownership risks upsetting the regulatory balance needed to manage the creation of Canadian dollars, with potential knock-on effects for financial stability. By way of comparison, Canada could look to Mexico, where the creation of Peso Credit occurs mainly through U.S. banks. Research suggests this has reduced the effectiveness of monetary policy with corollary risks for financial stability. Similarly, evidence suggests the effectiveness of South Korea’s monetary policy response to the 2008 financial crisis was undermined by the presence of U.S. multinational banks. Under normal circumstances, any takeover of a Canadian-owned bank must be approved by Canada’s finance minister, which reduces such risks. However, Canada’s streamlined regulatory system could become a target for American lobbying efforts aimed at foreign bank acquisitions. If U.S. banks gain a greater foothold, the impact it could have on Canada’s financial regulatory system is concerning, especially with an enlarged American market share. Reducing foreign banking restrictions seems unjustifiably short-sighted, particularly in an era of increasingly frequent financial crises. Additional risks also exist in the non-bank financial sector, where “shadow banks” issue unregulated money without oversight. Canada’s domesticated banking system and conservative regulatory approach allowed it to weather the 2008 crisis without relying on risky new asset classes like unregulated asset-backed commercial papers. However, capitulating to U.S. pressure could push Canada toward a more deregulated financial environment, leading to an increase in shadow banking and heightened risks of financial crises and costly public bailouts. A threat to Canada’s autonomy If these regulatory barriers did come down, it could hamstring Canada’s ability to implement additional regulatory restrictions — sometimes called financial repression — on the financial system at large in the event of a major crisis. Financial repression refers to regulatory policies that seek to direct domestic savings in order to finance government spending — often for the sake of deficit reduction, but also for managing the economy during systemic global crises. This measure could be warranted in situations like runaway climate change, wars or other crises. However, it can only be effectively implemented if a country has effective control of its financial system. Lifting these regulatory barriers could similarly undermine efforts to forge a more integrated economic union amid the spectre of U.S. expansionism. Since regulatory authority for the repurchase agreement market — a core national funding market — is shared between levels of government, it would be immensely risky to compromise another key pillar of our credit system. Capitulating to U.S. demands could lead to a significant loss of Canada’s monetary and economic sovereignty, at a time when the U.S. is prioritizing its national interests over global co-operation. Banking concentration in Canada There are certainly downsides to Canada maintaining its barriers to foreign bank branching. The most notable one is the role these restrictions play in supporting a banking system that is both concentrated and under-competitive. Today, Canada’s biggest six banks control 90 per cent of the banking market. This dominance is largely because the global banking trend over the past 40 years has been more about creating large universal banks for a globalized marketplace, rather than freeing markets and increasing consumer choice. In aligning Canada’s regulations with this model, federal regulators moved away from the previous era’s trend toward greater domestic competitiveness. If Canada truly wants to address its lack of banking competition, it should seek to revitalize it from below — not from above and outside. Among the proposals by Canada’s Competition Bureau are calls to enhance small- and medium-bank access to brokered deposits and various anti-monopoly measures. Regardless of whether one agrees with the merits of a concentrated banking system, the property rights that underpin it are a vital part of the public-private partnership that support Canada’s monetary sovereignty. This means that the present regulatory arrangement leaves the terms and conditions of that partnership firmly in Canadian hands. As the U.S. pushes for greater access to Canada’s banking market, Canadians must weigh the steep political costs of allowing a stronger American banking presence. Dustin Fergusson-Vaux does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Trump orders the creation of a sovereign wealth fund - more auto theft

 Trump orders the creation of a sovereign wealth fund. President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing the Treasury and Commerce Departments to create the nation’s first-ever sovereign wealth fund—something he hinted could be used to buy TikTok. These government investment vehicles are more typical in countries with budget surpluses (unlike the US which tends to have a deficit), and the order didn’t specify where the fund would get money from, although Trump has previously said it could be “tariffs and other intelligent things.”

Apple pulls UK cloud encryption

Apple pulls UK cloud encryption after government spying demands. Apple will no longer offer Advanced Data Protection, its end-to-end encrypted iCloud storage feature, to users in the UK. The tech giant’s decision to pull the feature comes after it reportedly received a secret government request for a backdoor entry to all customer data stored that way, which would have given British law enforcement access to information from users around the globe.