Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet - Gripen seems obvious

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet, seeks industrial return Canada delays F-35 decision as Ottawa weighs Gripen option and industrial retur...

Please, media, don’t turn the war into entertainment

 

Please, media, don’t turn the war into entertainment

8 things for journalists to keep in mind as they cover Trump’s military moves

The news media are good at covering war. Well, some parts of war: the explosions, the technology, the heroics.

But journalists tend to be terrible about covering other parts: the lies, the ulterior motives, the human misery.

With Donald Trump deciding on his own to take the U.S. into an illegal war against Iran, here are eight things the news media should keep in mind.

1. Don’t sanitize the impact on human beings.

I was nation/world editor at the Chicago Tribune during the Iraq War two decades ago. I saw how newsroom executives hated to show pictures of dead and wounded people, especially civilians. I’d hear comments like, “People don’t want to see that when they’re eating their corn flakes in the morning,” as if that should be a standard for news judgment.

Such attitudes motivate editors to hide the awful facts about war, performing a public disservice. That kind of coverage makes people think warfare isn’t as bad as it is – and in doing so, it makes people more willing to support war.

Also, the media should be wary about marveling too much about weapon systems. These are not great achievements of mankind; they’re killing machines. And war coverage should not be like an adventure movie. Don’t depict it as glamorous or entertaining,

Remember: War is ugly. The coverage should be too.

2. Put events in a complete, honest historical context.

On cable TV’s coverage of the U.S.-Iran animosity, I’ve heard anchors ask their guests: “Why does Iran hate us?” And the answers tend to be shallow, with the news media often unwilling to recall the whole story.

News stories this past weekend in the New York Times and Washington Post tied the current hostilities to the 1979 Islamic Revolution that toppled Iran’s dictator, the U.S.-backed Shah, and led to the new Iranian regime holding American embassy staff hostage. That, of course, is an important point in the U.S.-Iran story, but maybe not the most important point. Neither the NYT nor WaPo stories mentioned how the CIA helped engineer a coup in Iran 26 years earlier that overthrew a democratically elected government and installed the Shah, leading to his reign of terror against the Iranian people and then to religious extremists taking over the country. (To be fair, a separate WaPo story last week did note the CIA-backed coup. But a prominent story Sunday – when more people were paying attention – mentioned the embassy hostage crisis but not the coup, which might make some readers think the Iranians started the trouble.)

Why do Iranians hate us? Well, it might have something to do with us destroying their democracy seven decades ago.

3. Hold politicians accountable.

A ridiculously passive NYT headline over the weekend read: “U.S. Military Is Pulled Back Into Middle East Wars.” As if the country with the 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs had no agency. As if its leaders were helpless actors in someone else’s script.

4. Remember that the peace movement is patriotic, too.

There’s always a danger in U.S. wars that dissent is labeled as disloyalty. But in fact, the people who oppose Trump’s go-it-alone approach – without congressional authorization – are the ones showing the highest regard for our laws and the Constitution's system of checks and balances.

5. Keep in mind that lying politicians are even more dishonest during war.

Trump and his gang lie about nearly everything, and the war gives them an excuse to do it even more. Trump announced Saturday that the Iranian nuclear sites that were attacked were “totally obliterated,” even though he was in no position to know that, and other U.S. officials tried to soften that claim.

Trump’s indication last week that he might wait two weeks before deciding whether to attack was later described by the NYT as “military misdirection.” In other words, not an attempt to mislead the American people but an attempt to fool the Iranian military. He can now claim that his lies are in the interest of national security.

It’s up to news outlets to be extremely skeptical of Trump’s war claims and never present them as if they’re facts.

6. Don’t act like you’re “in the know” when you’re not.

After Trump indicated his decision on an attack might be two weeks away, CNN ran a story early Saturday headlined, “‘Always a peacemaker’: How Trump decided to hold off on striking Iran.” That headline looked clueless half a day later.

When the media are in the fog of war, they shouldn’t pretend they have a clear view.

7. Beware of irrational optimism.

Vice President JD Vance claimed Sunday that “this is not going to be some long, drawn-out thing.” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said, “this is most certainly not open-ended.”

They were talking about war, which is one of the most unpredictable things that human beings do. When people assure us that wars will end quickly, they’re lying.

8. Remember that war makes it easier for governments to take away personal liberties.

There’s a reason George Orwell wrote in “1984” that “The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous.” Totalitarian governments use war as a rationale for total control over their citizens. They frighten citizens into giving up their rights.

There’s also a real danger that Trump’s foreign war will engross the press and the public so much that they fail to focus on his domestic misconduct. But in these perilous times, journalists have a duty not to be distracted – and to tell the full story of his abuses at home and abroad.

Share

Quebec schools warn of across-the-board service cuts after surprise $510M budget cut | Making Morons

Quebec schools warn of across-the-board service cuts after surprise $510M budget cut | Montreal Gazette
EMSB chair says Quebec’s $510 million in cuts to schools will ‘destroy a generation’ By Andy Riga Updated June 16, 2025 4:29 PM Education Minister Bernard Drainville defended the budget plan, saying it marks a slowdown in spending growth — not cuts — after several years of major investments. Jacques Boissinot The Canadian Press Quebec school officials are warning of looming service cuts for elementary and high school students after Education Minister Bernard Drainville abruptly ordered last-minute budget cuts last week. English school boards and French school service centres say they must cut at least $510 million from their budgets. “Based on preliminary assessments, all services will be affected by the cuts, and it will be impossible to fully maintain all services for students,” Dominique Robert, head of the Fédération des centres de services scolaires du Québec, told The Gazette. The FCSSQ represents French school service centres. The English Montreal School Board, Quebec’s largest English board, echoed that view. For the EMSB, the cuts represent $20 million on an annual budget of $440 million, or 4.5 per cent, said EMSB chair Joe Ortona, who is also president of the Quebec English School Boards Association. “Over 90 per cent of our budget goes to direct services and salaries,” he said in an interview. “Even if we abolished every job in the head office, turned off the heating and electricity in all our schools, we wouldn’t reach $20 million.” What the Coalition Avenir Québec government is asking for is “impossible,” he said. “They’re essentially telling us to close schools, cut teachers, cut staff, have overcrowded classrooms, and just put the entire education system in disarray. It’s indecent.” Drainville has a track record of dropping surprise funding cuts. Earlier this year, school boards and service centres were told to slash $200 million, Ortona said. He added: “They are asking us to destroy a generation because they destroyed Quebec’s finances.”

Read more at: https://www.montrealgazette.com/news/provincial-news/article992728.html#storylink=cpy

16 billion exposed login credentials

 

Several collections of login credentials reveal one of the largest data breaches in history, totaling a humongous 16 billion exposed login credentials. The data most likely originates from various infostealers.

This story, based on unique Cybernews findings and originally published on the website on June 18, is constantly being updated with clarifications and additional information in response to public discourse. The most recent version of the article features comments from Cybernews researcher Aras Nazarovas and Bob Diachenko who unveiled this recent data leak. We've also added a few screenshots as proof of the leak.

Key takeaways:

Unnecessarily compiling sensitive information can be as damaging as actively trying to steal it. For example, the Cybernews research team discovered a plethora of supermassive datasets, housing billions upon billions of login credentials. From social media and corporate platforms to VPNs and developer portals, no stone was left unturned.

Our team has been closely monitoring the web since the beginning of the year. So far, they’ve discovered 30 exposed datasets containing from tens of millions to over 3.5 billion records each. In total, the researchers uncovered an unimaginable 16 billion records.

None of the exposed datasets were reported previously, bar one: in late May, Wired magazine reported a security researcher discovering a “mysterious database” with 184 million records. It barely scratches the top 20 of what the team discovered. Most worryingly, researchers claim new massive datasets emerge every few weeks, signaling how prevalent infostealer malware truly is.

The market keeps flirting with new highs

 

Traders looking pleased

Timothy A. Clary/Getty Images

Like Wilt Chamberlain, stocks are pulling off some all-time rebounding: The S&P 500 closed within a hair of a new record yesterday, marking an enormous comeback from the multitrillion-dollar mudslide that followed the April announcement of “Liberation Day” tariffs.

Despite a persistent vibe of uncertainty related to US economic policy and geopolitics:

  • The S&P 500 closed less than 0.1% away from a record high yesterday, which it notched in February before cratering nearly 20% in April. The index has regained ground in fits and starts since then and briefly surpassed its record in intraday trading yesterday.
  • On Tuesday, the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 one-upped the broader market and logged its highest-ever close. It came after President Trump said Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire, which eased investors’ concerns about a potential oil crisis.

Between unresolved geopolitical conflicts and President Trump’s still-unfolding tariff policies, a portfolio manager with Capital Wealth Planning, Kevin Simpson, told CNBC that he was “surprised by the magnitude of the rebound.”

How is this happening?

Trump has walked back some of the harshest tariffs he threatened in April, and trade deals since then have been music to the market’s ears.

Investors also seem “eager…to buy dips in a market dominated by megacap tech and AI enthusiasm,” Simpson said.

  • Nvidia hit a record high this week, powered by above-expectation earnings that helped temper fears that China’s DeepSeek could prove more cost-effective than US startups.
  • Palantir is the year-to-date gains leader on both the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. The software company has increasingly gotten into high-paying government contracts and recently secured a $30 million deal to develop a “surveillance” platform for ICE, Wired reported.

Looking ahead…two anticipated interest rate cuts, the Big Beautiful Bill’s corporate tax cuts, and deregulation are set to ultimately boost company earnings and send the markets even higher, a Wells Fargo strategist predicts. But more volatility is expected in the meantime.—ML

Trump LOSES ALL CONTROL as he COLLAPSES HIS TERM


Donald Trump is losing control of the U.S. economy as foreign investors continue to flee from U.S. assets. While Trump shouts at the rain, Jerome Powell and anyone else in his way, the economy is sinking deeper and deeper into bleak territory. Treasury outflows in April showed that the U.S. went upside down with more money flowing out of the U.S. than coming in. This is a staggering revelation and the summer hasn’t even begun. Housing starts and new permits are collapsing, continuing unemployment claims are increasing and a war in the Middle East threatens to heat up inflation as oil prices break through resistance levels. In a few short months, Donald Trump has driven the U.S. economy into the ground and it only gets worse from here with him at the helm. Max from ‪@UNFTR‬ breaks it all down.

Message from MeidasTouch

 

CRITICAL Message from MeidasTouch Founder!

By Ben Meiselas

Hello Substack Subscribers. It’s Ben Meiselas, co-founder of MeidasTouch. It’s Sunday, so let’s have a coffee—or a beverage of your choice—together and let’s chat.

First, let me thank our Subscribers. I’ve got some great data to report for you all.

The MeidasTouch Network continues to lead all cable news networks in digital views. We continue to get more monthly podcast downloads than Joe Rogan, Candace Owens, and Charlie Kirk combined (Remember to add the MeidasTouch Podcast on Apple Podcasts and Spotify to keep this momentum going).

We don’t have investors. Your subscriptions are critical to helping us grow. Subscribe today.

Let’s get into it.

I want to discuss something that sets the MeidasTouch Network apart. We were not afraid to immediately call out the Trump regime and Governor Abbott for their failures related to the flash floods in Kerr County, Texas.

We didn’t hesitate to call out the facts. I stand behind our coverage, and I am proud of our fearless reporting.

The facts are the following:

  1. Trump has fired or forced out a huge number of employees at the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), the NWS (National Weather Service), and FEMA.

  2. Trump and his Secretary of Homeland Security, Kristi Noem, have repeatedly called for FEMA to be eliminated.

  3. The Trump regime fired the interim head of FEMA—an ultra-MAGA guy—because he testified before Congress that he personally did not want to see FEMA eliminated.

  4. Kristi Noem has bragged about diverting (aka stealing) $450 million in FEMA funds to fund the Alligator Alcatraz concentration camp in Florida.

  5. Numerous top meteorologists have said weather forecasting is now severely degraded because of the Trump and DOGE cuts.

  6. The Trump regime is now only sending a small fraction of the weather balloons needed for accurate forecasting.

  7. A significant amount of resources within NOAA, NWS, and FEMA have been removed, dismantled, or defunded.

  8. In April, Paul Yura—the warning coordination meteorologist at the NWS Austin/San Antonio office, with over 32 years of experience—was forced out by DOGE and took early retirement.

These are the undisputed facts that predated the flash floods in Texas.

This isn’t spin.

These are just the facts.

Since the catastrophic storm in Kerr County, Texas, here is what we’ve also learned:

  1. Local law enforcement officials blame the NWS for their forecast and ineffective communications.

  2. The top government official in Kerr County said he wasn’t aware the storm would be this big and could not explain why he didn’t evacuate people earlier.

  3. Kristi Noem held a press conference in Texas on Saturday where she blamed faulty equipment and the Biden administration for criticisms about the federal warning.

  4. Noem said Texas was leading the operations related to the flash floods and search and rescue, and that FEMA and the feds would provide resources as needed.

As of the time I am writing this, we know of 52 deaths from the flash floods. Many of these deaths are young girls. There are over 20 young girls from Camp Mystic who are still unaccounted for.

Our hearts go out to all the families enduring this unthinkable tragedy in Texas. I am so sad and heartbroken about this horrible situation. The loss of life is so tragic.

Given the undisputed facts I listed above, I still think it’s critical we ask tough questions of the regime and call out the lack of communication between the federal and Texas state governments. What happened? I feel duty-bound to ask these questions and look into it.

I think one of the biggest issues not being discussed is that states like Texas are simply not equipped to deal with these situations alone.

In the past, the federal government would establish joint responsibilities the moment an emergency forecast was made and immediately pre-position resources.

The feds would work with state and local governments to come up with evacuation and emergency plans—and coordinate it. Together. Even with fast-developing storms, the feds would be there at all stages.

The feds would jealously guard their jurisdiction and authority and would never say they would not be leading efforts regarding catastrophic storms.

How can we ignore that local officials in Texas—from a very pro-MAGA area—are pointing fingers at the NWS and blaming them?

You have Kristi Noem seeming to blame Biden and the NWS equipment, and suggesting that the feds are only playing an ancillary or support role while Texas is taking the lead.

Throughout the Biden administration, MAGA and the media blamed Biden for every natural disaster and catastrophe—even when Biden appropriately responded and mitigated the disasters with all available resources.

Often, MAGA and the compliant media would just make things up and lie about Biden’s handling of situations with defamatory accusations that were reported as fact.

Democrats or others in the media were afraid to come to Biden’s defense for fear of being viewed as weak or an accomplice to the defamatory lies reported as truth.

In the absence of a defense and the truth getting out, the lies became what was reported.

Now, with the Trump regime in power, there seems to be a timidity in calling out the Trump regime’s handling of disasters—as though it’s taboo.

I’ve seen news outlets talk about how America “lost” its emergency forecasting capabilities as if it just disappeared.

I’ve seen people say it’s too soon to criticize Trump or that it’s politicizing the situation.

I don’t think we should ignore what local officials in Texas are saying about the forecasting. Even if the forecast was accurate, was there a robust federal and state coordination before the storm hit, as should have occurred? Why did it take almost a full day for Trump to say anything about the flood? Why was he partying and dancing to the YMCA song on Friday when he should have known what was happening?

Also, this is not the only devastating storm where the issue of resources and federal assistance has become a problem recently.

There have been multiple storms over the past 90 days that have resulted in mass casualty events where federal resourcing and assistance have been an issue.

Many of these storms—in states like Kentucky, Mississippi, Missouri, Arkansas, West Virginia, and others—were simply ignored by Trump, even as they caused dozens of deaths. FEMA has denied supplemental emergency requests for both Georgia and North Carolina since Trump took office.

Our reporting must be fearless. It must also be compassionate. We must hold the regime accountable for its failures.

I ultimately know that’s why you are here at the MeidasTouch Substack and why we’ve grown the way we have.

The MeidasTouch Network needs your help today.

As I mentioned before, we don’t have investors. Yet, we still beat Fox and Joe Rogan.

One of the ways we’ve grown and expanded the network—while always staying independent—is through your subscriptions.

If you aren’t subscribed to the MeidasTouch Substack, please do so now.

You can also gift subscriptions to people you know if you are already subscribed.

We have a difficult July subscriber goal to hit, and we’d love for you to be a subscriber and help the MeidasTouch Network grow.

Thanks for having coffee with me.

Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Give a gift subscription


The violence and incitement are coming from Trump

 

The violence and incitement are coming from Trump

Words & Phrases We Could Do Without

Donald Trump twists language, as do all autocrats, to cast himself and his cult as victims, whereas his dissenters are violent, rebellious, and threatening. In the real world, however, we have seen Trump repeatedly provoke violence rather than take any measures to prevent it. Indeed, he has historically encouraged rather than condemned violent supporters.

The president deliberately confuses “violence” with “protest,” and “rebellion” with “demonstrations.” He insisted in his memorandum nationalizing the California National Guard and deploying the Marines that he holds the power to deploy forces anywhere in the U.S. where protests are or are likely to occur. He later threatened to use “heavy force” against protestors who showed up at his sparsely attended birthday parade.

This all feeds into a pattern. When Trump called for his mob to charge the Capitol on Jan. 6 or egged on the crowd chanting “Hang Mike Pence,” he was inciting violence. As Gov. Gavin Newsom remarked to Californians, “Trump—he’s not opposed to lawlessness and violence, as long as it serves HIM. What more evidence do we need than January 6th?” When Trump pardoned violent insurrectionists, he established an approval structure that encouraged other acts of violence (be they in MinnesotaUtah, or Culpepper, Va.)

When Trump sent Marines and the National Guard into a relatively calm city, that was “incitement.” He was spoiling for a fight to justify more repression and state terror against ordinary workers whom he has demonized and dehumanized. And when he vowed to step up raids of masked ICE agents in Democratic cities, he was threatening to incite more violence.

Trump consistently tries to use opponents’ imaginary violence to justify the use of force. However, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer of the Northern District of California debunked the government’s claimed authority to deploy force in anticipation of a “rebellion”:

[T]he Court is troubled by the implication inherent in Defendants’ argument that protest against the federal government, a core civil liberty protected by the First Amendment, can justify a finding of rebellion. The [Supreme Court cases] are chock-full of language explaining the importance of individuals’ right to speak out against the government—even when doing so is uncomfortable, even when doing so is provocative, even when doing so causes inconvenience….

Applying these principles, courts have repeatedly reaffirmed that peaceful protest does not lose its protection merely because some isolated individuals act violently outside the protections of the First Amendment.

Breyer reaffirmed that preempting or preventing First Amendment expression on the speculation that violence might occur is verboten under the First Amendment. “In short, individuals’ right to protest the government is one of the fundamental rights protected by the First Amendment, and just because some stray bad actors go too far does not wipe out that right for everyone,” Breyer wrote. “The idea that protesters can so quickly cross the line between protected conduct and ‘rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States’ is untenable and dangerous.”

Now, even core First Amendment speech is enough to set off a MAGA crackdown. MAGA authoritarians suggest the standard for use of force against peaceful Americans is so low that even “failing to show deference” to the regime is sufficient cause to trigger government violence, as the Department of Homeland Security claimed after manhandling Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) When the temerity of voicing dissent is sufficient to trigger a violent government crackdown, we should be clear which side has resorted to violence.

Trump appears “eager to create optics that support his claim that public dissent constitutes an existential threat to the nation,” writes Ruth Ben Ghiat. She adds that Trump, in true authoritarian style, uses various methods: “Flooding our screens with images that habituate us to a new reality of federalized state militia members standing opposite civilian protesters is part of it. So is mobilizing our armed forces for a parade staged on Mr. Trump’s birthday.” This is about intimidation, crushing dissent, and brute force. Trump’s characterization of protestors has nothing to do with their actual conduct, and everything to do with whether they are on his side. Whoever does not conform to his dictates is fair game for the strongman’s violence.

In sum, Trump has defiled ordinary language (“preventative,” “rebellion”). He mischaracterizes protests as “violence” or “riots,” and falsely adopts the mantle of “restoring law and order.” Those words have lost any semblance of meaning under his regime. Instead of adopting his descriptions, we must acknowledge that Trump actions fit the playbook of fascists, who instrumentalize violence to crack down on opposition. Trump wants to prevent dissent, and will use violence to accomplish his meansHe wants to provoke and incite a violent response, leaving him with justification to crush his opponents.

If that sounds like the death knell of democracy, it is. Thankfully, millions of people peacefully demonstrated on Saturday that they know what the First Amendment allows, and do not intend to let Trump get away with inflicting violence on our Constitution or brutalizing fellow Americans.

The Contrarian is reader-supported. You enable us to keep up the patriotic opposition—and to have fun along the way. To support our work and join our community of good troublemakers, please consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Employees are imprisoned in an ‘infinite workday

 

an illustration of a person in the middle of a clock surrounded by laptops with notifications instead of numbers

Illustration: Anna Kim, Photos: Runstudio/Getty Images, Adobe Stock

Workdays once had a defined beginning and end. But, much like a bad first date or a card game at a party, workdays are increasingly stretching on forever, per the latest data from Microsoft’s Work Trend Index Special Report.

The “infinite workday,” as Microsoft calls it, began as an anomaly with the rise of remote work during the pandemic but has since become the norm for many who are unable to disconnect completely. Microsoft made the observation after parsing “trillions” of data points across its Microsoft 365 products.

Brace for the soul-crushing numbers:

  • Early mornings: Microsoft used telemetry to determine that 40% of people online at 6am are checking work email instead of hitting the snooze. Meanwhile, Teams becomes the primary communication platform within the Microsoft environment by 8am, with workers receiving an average of 153 messages per weekday.
  • Midday: Half of meetings take place between 9am and 11am and 1pm and 3pm, right when people are at their most productive (due to circadian rhythms). And 57% of meetings occur without a calendar invite, while 1 in 10 are booked last minute.
  • Evenings/weekends: Meetings after 8pm are up 16% over last year, and the average employee sends or receives more than 50 emails outside of regular business hours. On weekends, ~20% of employees check work email before noon.

Got a minute? This might be the most staggering detail from the report: Employees using Microsoft 365 are interrupted by a meeting, email, or notification every two minutes during “core business hours,” and that doesn’t even include your coworker swinging by your desk to tell you about their fantasy football team.

AI could help (and also hurt). The report concludes that using AI for menial tasks will free humans to focus on more important aspects of their jobs. But as Forbes notes, if AI is only freeing people for more assignments, a healthy work-life balance will remain out of reach.—DL