Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet - Gripen seems obvious

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet, seeks industrial return Canada delays F-35 decision as Ottawa weighs Gripen option and industrial retur...

 


Softphone   

A softphone is software you can download for your mobile phone, laptop, or tablet. It works as a connector between your VoIP provider and the traditional telecommunications network.   

When building your professional virtual phone system, you’ll learn that your business phone system must have a softphone to work – IP phones and other hardware are optional.  

You can use Microsoft Teams as a softphone (and we have a connector to help!) or hire another third-party app.   

Take a look at an in-depth list of softphones and their main features in our Wiki but know that some of them are free, others have a paywall to either get the softphone or unlock its full potential.  

For this scenario, let’s choose Zoiper: it offers free versions for iOS, Android and desktop, but a paid version with full access to all its functionalities. Assuming a small company with a limited budget, initially a free mobile app or desktop version might suffice.   

Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google’s New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy

Android Security or Vendor Lock-In? Google’s New Sideloading Rules Smell Fishy

Google already dominates the global smartphone market through Android, and now it is taking another step that has many, including myself, concerned. You see, Android powers more than 70 percent of smartphones worldwide, which gives Google unrivaled influence over how billions of people use their devices.

The company announced that starting in 2026, apps installed on certified Android devices, whether through the Play Store, sideloaded APKs, or third-party stores like F-Droid, will need to come from a developer who has gone through Google’s new verification process.

Google frames this as a security measure to protect against fraud and malware. According to its own research, apps from internet sideloading sources are over 50 times more likely to contain malware compared to those on the Play Store. The main idea here is to make it harder for repeat offenders to return under a new identity after being banned.

The irony here is hard to ignore. Despite years of security features baked into Android, sophisticated spyware like Pegasus has still managed to bypass protections and infect devices. It is difficult not to see this as Google tightening its grip on the entire Android ecosystem under the guise of safety.

The rollout begins in October 2025 with early access for some developers, expanding to all developers in March 2026. By September 2026, the requirements will be enforced in Brazil, Indonesia, Singapore, and Thailand. A global rollout is expected from 2027 onward.

Security or Gatekeeping?

the android developer verification is shown here with two main steps listed
The steps required to get verified under the Android Developer Verification program.

The verification process will require developers to register with Google through a dedicated Android Developer Console, built specifically for those distributing outside the Play Store.

A separate dashboard will exist for student and hobbyist developers, but the system still requires sharing personal identifying information like legal name, address, and phone number with Google.

Do you see the problem with this approach?

This change will have major implications for free and open source software. F-Droid and other alternative app stores rely on independent developers, many of whom may be unwilling or unable to provide their personal details to Google.

While sideloading will technically remain possible, the barrier of developer verification means fewer apps will be available outside Google’s control.

In practice, this could turn Google into the effective gatekeeper for all apps on "certified" Android devices, which includes nearly every modern Android phone that hasn’t been rooted, aside from the likes of Huawei.

This will be difficult for competition regulators worldwide to ignore. By requiring all apps on certified Android devices to come from Google-verified developers, the company is not banning sideloading outright, but it is centralizing control over who can distribute apps at scale.


Companies are benefiting from AI-driven layoffs

 

Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

There was a time not long ago when a CEO would announce mass firings to the dismay of investors. But these days, with cheaper generative AI replacing the more costly humans, it’s become a point of pride for CEOs—and a reason for shareholders to celebrate.

The latest example is Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff telling The Logan Bartlett Show podcast about cutting 4,000 customer service jobs thanks to the type of AI that Matthew McConaughey and Woody Harrelson seemingly can’t function without. In June, Benioff said that AI is doing 50% of the work at Salesforce. Yesterday, the slimmed-down company reported a Q2 double beat on revenue ($10.24b vs. $10.14b) and EPS ($2.91 vs. $2.78), although weaker guidance for Q3 sent the stock tumbling after hours.

It’s a feature, not a bug

There’s no shortage of companies leveraging AI to remain profitable, to the delight of (non-Salesforce) investors:

  • Wells Fargo’s CEO has touted trimming its workforce for 20 straight quarters. Its stock is up 228% over the past five years.
  • Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan wasn’t hiding it during a recent earnings call when he said the company has let go of 88,000 employees over the past 15 years. BofA stock is up 95% since 2020.
  • Amazon, with its share value up 28% over the past year, recently told staff that AI implementation would lead to layoffs.
  • Microsoft has cut 15,000 jobs in the past two months as the company pivots to AI—and its stock is also up since the beginning of July.

Zoom out: Per HR Dive, 34% of CEOs plan to enact layoffs in the next 12 months, the fifth straight quarter that number has risen. Molly Kinder, a senior fellow at Brookings, whose expertise is in AI and the present and future of work, told the WSJ: “I don’t think that’s good news for the American worker.”—DL


Residents, Experts Rally Against Massive Gas Plant on Sensitive N.B. Isthmus


Residents, Experts Rally Against Massive Gas Plant on Sensitive N.B. Isthmus

About 80 people gathered in the basement of a church in Midgic, New Brunswick, to oppose a proposed 500-megawatt gas plant near Centre Village, warning it could threaten wetlands, drinking water, and local wildlife—and urging a shift toward renewable energy alternatives.

Meeting organizer Terry Jones, whose 178-acre family property is only 1.4 kilometres from the plant proposed on the ecologically sensitive Chignecto Isthmus, told attendees the biggest impact of the gas plant would be on local wetlands, water, and wells, former CBC Radio journalist Bruce Wark reported for NB Media Co-op.

“And this water damage is going to travel all the way to the Tantramar River, to Sackville, to the aquifers down there. So to think that it’s just a Centre Village project, that’s just the tip of the iceberg,” Jones said.

“What we need to do is look at slowing this project down for sure so that we have time,” Jones said,.“Because if everything passes through, they’re going to start in the fall drilling test wells, and in January, first quarter of next year, building and starting the infrastructure.”

“It’s not that we’re anti-progress or anti-development. Not at all,” meeting organizer and Midgic resident Juliette Bulmer told the gathering.

“It’s just such a sensitive area right here.”

It’s one of the few corridors with migratory birds, a moose project, and more, she added.

“A lot of you have been living on the land for a long time. You’ve got generations of families and you know what it’s been like living here,” Bulmer said as someone in the audience called out, “The water is so good here.”

“The water is so good here,” Bulmer repeated.

“We have a right to have clean water, clean air, and to enjoy our property,” Jones said adding there’s potential for safe, eco-friendly tourism in the area.

“But, we’re looking at building a concrete pad up there and sticking in generating stations.”

No ‘Confidence’ In The Province

MLA Megan Mitton (GPC-Tantramar) reported on the provincial environment minister’s response to her letter calling for a comprehensive environmental impact assessment (EIA) that would require extensive public consultations.

She said Gilles LePage wrote back to say he would not decide on whether to order a comprehensive EIA until initial reviews had been completed, and he added: “It should be noted that comprehensive reviews are generally required for large scale projects like mines, refineries, nuclear power, etc.”

“So, I don’t have confidence in the provincial government,” Mitton said.

She offered to use her constituency office to coordinate e-mail and telephone lists as a tool for organizing and sharing information. She said she would also present petitions against the project in the legislature, but warned that legislators won’t meet until October and it’s easy for the government to ignore petitions.

Diesel Dangers

Barry Rothfuss, executive director of the Atlantic Wildlife Institute (AWI), which would be 4.5 kilometres from the generating plant, spoke about his expertise in addressing the environmental effects of projects like this.

AWI is the only organization in Atlantic Canada that is certified to deal with risks and threats to ecologically sensitive flora and fauna, and to suggest ways of mitigating damage when it occurs.

“I’ve been in a lot of facilities like this,” he said. “Just to access these facilities, you need special training. You need understanding of the environments you’re walking into.”

He added that the big, 10-generator plant will be using diesel fuel as a backup to gas. That would require a diesel storage capacity of three million gallons.

Rothfuss said if significant leaks occurred, local organizations would not have the capacity to deal with them.

“These types of facilities are notorious for leaks and things going wrong and human error,” he added.

In addition to AWI, speakers for the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society and EOS Eco-Energy expressed their environmental concerns about the proposed gas and diesel plant.

Renewable Alternatives

Activist Leslie Chandler told the meeting there are alternatives to fossil fuels such as gas and diesel, including battery energy storage systems.

“The cost of those systems has dropped 50% since 2022,” she said.

“And building one of those is cheaper than a gas plant,” she added referring to a report from the Clean Energy States Alliance in Maine.

Chandler noted that PROENERGY, the American company contracted to build and operate the gas plant, was holding open houses and urged people to carry a message to company representatives.

“Say our community is not having this and we are going renewable.”

“We’re just not buying it, we’re not having it, it’s not happening here,” she added.

Bruce Wark worked in broadcasting and journalism education for more than 35 years. He was at CBC Radio for nearly 20 years as senior editor of network programs such as The World at Six and World Report. He currently writes The New Wark Times, where a version of this story first appeared on August 12, 2025.

The story was published August 13, 2025 by NB Media Co-op and is republished with permission.

Proton Emergency Access: What is It?

Proton Emergency Access: What is It?

an illustration that shows the people i trust page in proton pass with an emergency contact added
Source: Proton

Imagine being stuck somewhere you cannot access your devices, maybe due to travel restrictions, an accident, a foreign occupation, or even a high-risk situation involving persecution by authorities over your work.

With this, you can assign up to five trusted contacts. These people can request access to your Proton account if you are unavailable, but you stay in control of who gets access during the waiting period.

Once the waiting period is over, access is automatically granted, ensuring your data can be managed when it’s needed most. Moreover, it’s easy to add or remove trusted contacts anytime, and all your data still stays protected under Proton’s end-to-end encryption umbrella.

The waiting period is flexible, btw. It ranges from 1 day to several months, so you decide how long contacts must wait before access is granted. This feature works across all Proton services, like MailCalendarDriveVPNPass, and Wallet. (partner links)

Keep in mind that Emergency Access is only available for users on Proton’s paid plansFree plan users won’t have access to this feature.

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world | Devi Sridhar | The Guardian

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world | Devi Sridhar | The Guardian

RFK Jr has slashed vaccine research. You need to know how perilous that is for the world

Devi Sridhar

The avian flu virus is now just one mutation away from easier transmission among humans. Donald Trump’s health chief is a grave risk to world health

  • Prof Devi Sridhar is chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh

You’d be hard-pressed to find many public health experts who have positive things to say about Donald Trump’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic in the United States. Alongside his numerous policy failures, one Cornell University study found that he was the biggest source of Covid-19 misinformation. But if there’s one redeeming feature to Trump’s pandemic record, it has to be his leadership on Operation Warp Speed – a massive, government-funded initiative that played a pivotal role in fast-tracking Covid-19 vaccines.

“Operation Warp Speed stands as one of the most remarkable scientific and humanitarian achievements of the past half-century,” the former US surgeon general Jerome Adams said. It directed billions of dollars into vaccine development and manufacturing, particularly into the mRNA platform, which became the backbone of the Moderna and Pfizer/BioNTech vaccines.

Vaccines work by preparing the body’s immune system to identify and successfully attack foreign agents entering the body. Traditional vaccines use weakened or inactivated viruses to offer a baby version for the body to fight and learn from. These vaccines are often produced by growing the virus in hen’s eggs, which means production is slow and can take months to scale up. In contrast, the mRNA platform functions like a plug-and-play video game console: you just “plug in” the genetic code of a particular virus or pathogen. The vaccine provides instructions to our bodies to make parts of the virus in our own cells, which then prompts an immune response.

The process of creating and manufacturing these vaccines is much faster and more flexible than their traditional counterparts. This is especially important for a disease such as avian flu, which has an up to 100% mortality rate in chickens. But despite the speed in which they come together, there is still a considerable time-lag before mass rollout to allow for clinical trials to ensure human safety, test for side-effects and figure out optimal dosing. During the Covid pandemic, the Moderna and Pfizer vaccines were created within weeks of research teams receiving the genetic sequencing of SARS-CoV-2 from China in January 2020. What took a year was the testing and regulatory approval processes to ensure there was trust in their safety.

Given Trump’s success with Operation Warp Speed, it’s particularly bizarre that Robert F Kennedy Jr, his health and human services secretary, has announced $500m in cuts to the mRNA vaccine investment portfolio. These include cancelling funding for Moderna’s development into a late-stage H5N1 avian flu vaccine. I asked Prof Rebecca Katz, a global health security expert and former US State Department adviser, for her assessment of the damage. She called it: “A self-inflicted wound to a vital organ.”

On its own, RFK Jr’s decision isn’t surprising, considering his longstanding anti-vax advocacy and cult-like following. He has built a whole identity on anti-science rhetoric and he is especially vocal about the supposed dangers of mRNA technology. But being an anti-vaxxer is also a tricky road to navigate: RFK Jr upset his base when, under considerable political pressure, he finally endorsed MMR vaccinations during the Texas measles outbreak.

But putting one personality aside, what do these cuts mean for the health of people living in the US and the wider world? It’s bad news. Take the example of H5N1 avian flu. This virus has shown concerning step-changes including becoming endemic in wild birds, infecting a number of poultry farms, and now has sufficient mutations to enable cow-to-cow (mammal to mammal) transmission in the US among dairy cattle. With its circulation in certain herds of dairy cattle has come a rise in human infections (cow-to-human). The virus is now one mutation away from easier transmission among humans. That’s the nightmare scenario: an influenza pandemic, possibly more lethal than Covid-19.

If a human-to-human transmissible H5N1 strain appears, the existing mRNA infrastructure could be used to rapidly develop a targeted vaccine. Many countries, including the UK, have been stockpiling vaccine components or ramping up surveillance. Under the Biden administration, the US had been among the leaders in this effort. By shelving investment and halting further development, the US is essentially gambling that we won’t need quick medical countermeasures. It’s a dangerous bet. When the next pandemic happens, the cost in human lives could be much higher than we witnessed in 2020.

Can other countries simply pick up the slack with mRNA production? Not easily. After the Covid pandemic led to huge disparities in which places in the world had access to vaccine supply, many countries starting planning for their own vaccine and mRNA hubs. They didn’t want to be dependent on the charity of the US or UK to donate them doses: they wanted to independently respond effectively. On a National Academies project that I was vice-chair of on the global coordination of vaccines for pandemic influenza, we looked closely into regional production, including in Africa. What I learned from experts across the world is that vaccine production, especially mRNA-based vaccines, requires a high degree of technical expertise, quality control and highly specialised supply chains. It will happen in other places, but not quickly enough to shoulder the impact of the US decision.

Unlike foreign aid cuts, where the effect is felt immediately in the shutting down of food programmes or health clinics, cuts to research funding have a slower, deeper impact, especially in terms of expertise and knowledge generation. Research programmes that were working on pandemic preparedness are closing. Postdoctoral researchers aren’t finding jobs, without the necessary soft money to support them. PhD programmes have been frozen or cancelled. Universities, highly dependent on government funding, are scaling back their research activities in health, especially in areas that money is being cut from. Perhaps most devastating of all: smart, ambitious young scientists have fewer opportunities to develop careers in public health research and vaccine development. They’ll look elsewhere – into AI, tech, finance. Where will the expertise come from in the next 15 to 20 years if the career pipeline is being shut down?

RFK Jr may position himself as Making America Healthy Again, but in reality, his policies make the entire world more vulnerable. He may, in fact, be the most dangerous person in the Trump administration – not because he’s loud or erratic, but because he’s steadily eroding the foundation of public health research and infrastructure. This isn’t just bad policy. It’s a generational setback. In that light, RFK Jr stands not merely as a controversial figure but as a serious risk to national and global health security.

  • Prof Devi Sridhar is chair of global public health at the University of Edinburgh