Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

The Court That Let Democracy Bleed

The Court That Let Democracy Bleed MeidasTouch Network and Michael Cohen Jul 15, 2025 Guest article by Michael Cohen In a chilling, unsigne...

The new Hitler Youth - history repeats once again

 

Private Jet-Flying, Charlie Kirk-Wannabe Teen Sets Off MAGA Firestorm

The fight over Brilyn Hollyhand symbolizes a bigger problem for MAGA.

Brilyn Hollyhand during an appearance on Here’s the Deal With Kellyanne at the studios of the Fox News Channel on September 11, 2024 in New York City. (Photo by John Lamparski/Getty Images)


ASPIRING CONSERVATIVE PUNDIT Brilyn Hollyhand had a good thing going. Charlie Kirk’s assassination had put new energy into the pro-Trump speaking circuit on college campuses, giving Hollyhand—a 19-year-old with an encyclopedic grasp of Republican talking points—an opportunity to rack up national media hits discussing Kirk’s legacy and bringing fresh attention to his own Kirk-like campus events.

And, for a little while, Hollyhand was handily meeting the moment. He went on a number of TV networks and podcasts to memorialize his “mentor” Kirk, and he also launched a ten-stop “One Conversation at a Time” speaking series that he said was being done in partnership with Kirk’s Turning Point USA outfit.

But the teenager made a tactical error on Thursday when he posted a video of himself flying on a private jet to his next speaking stop, a luxury watch apparently on his wrist. Paired with a recent New York Post profile anointing him as Kirk’s “protege,” this was all a bit much for many conservatives.

(Screenshot via @BrilynHollyhand on X)

And it prompted some of them to ask: Wait, how did this improbably named guy come to claim Kirk’s mantle?

Nick Sortor, a Republican influencer who cohosted an episode of Kirk’s show after his assassination, called Hollyhand a “grifter” and said his campus tour was a “distraction” from TPUSA’s actual college campus work.

Hollyhand has tried to tamp down the private-jet backlash by claiming a “hometown friend” lent him the jet for the first leg of his tour. This seems reasonable: Who doesn’t have a friend willing to lend out their private jet at a moment’s notice?

Yet the anger at Hollyhand continued through the weekend. And it points to a bigger issue that is roiling the Trump coalition in the wake of Kirk’s death.

The emerging divide isn’t just over who, specifically, is going to be the main figure helping to further Kirk’s mission of organizing young conservatives. It’s also about what it actually means to be a young conservative in the age of Trump.

Share

Despite not yet having hit the legal drinking age, Hollyhand actually has been in Republican political circles for some time now. He has been involved in the conservative YouTube and podcasting circuit for years, delivering campus speeches and appearing at confabs. He started the “Truth Gazette” email newsletter at the tender age of 11 (we respect the hustle). Last year, he was involved in a “Get Off the Sidelines Tour” with TPUSA, released a book with one of the major conservative publishing houses, and was a member of the Republican National Committee’s youth council.

His vibe is very “country club”—and we mean that quite literally: In the now-infamous private jet video, he is sporting a striped polo shirt with the Master’s logo on it. In his speeches, he comes off like a throwback to a pre-Trump Republican party, delivering bland talking points about American opportunity and capitalism. The private jet cemented the idea that he is being foisted onto young conservatives by wealthy donors who want to steer the Gen-Z right in the direction of more traditional, buttoned-up Republican beliefs. Perhaps worst of all, conservatives fear Hollyhand just doesn’t have the juice to win more young people to the Republican party.

“We CANNOT let the GOP fall back into this garbage,” moaned popular far-right X account and antisemite “Captive Dreamer” in response to a Hollyhand clip about left-wing anti-Israel protests.

Hollyhand is distinctly swagless. That 2024 book on conservative youth, One Generation Away, reads like a greatest-hits collection from CPAC 2004; it goes heavy on Ronald Reagan. And while Hollyhand insists he wrote the book himself (in secret, while in high school), in his acknowledgments, Hollyhand also thanks a long list of supporters involved in its creation—including Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) and her husband, with whom Hollyhand claims to be friends.


Pick and choose which Bulwark newsletters and podcasts arrive in your inbox:


In an era when young Republicans are more likely to find inspiration in obese toad memes and beef-tallow recipes, the earnest Hollyhand gives off the vibe of a Latter-day Saints missionary venturing into the depths of the Amazon. Mike Adams, a nutrition-supplement pusher and conspiracy theorist associated with Alex Jones, inadvertently summarized his camp’s complaint when he called Hollyhand a “goober.”

“This kid never earned anything that would justify the publicity that’s being bought and placed upon him,” Adams tweeted.

Of course, Kirk himself was ridiculed for years—on the right and far beyond—for embodying what a rich Republican would imagine a young Republican to be. And, like Hollyhand, he relied on the largesse of wealthy benefactors. If Hollyhand has learned anything from Kirk, it should be that the memes about his fancy trappings and rich backers can actually help him achieve the crossover social-media ubiquity that Kirk enjoyed.

But Hollyhand’s personal affluence poses additional problems. His family has grown wealthy from building affordable housing—a cardinal sin on the segregationist right. To them, the Hollyhands benefited from bringing poor, mostly minority families on Section 8 vouchers into white neighborhoods, meaning they’re exactly the kind of race-blind conservatives people like Captive Dreamer think the Republican party should leave behind.


To defend his claim to even a tiny slice of Kirk’s legacy, Hollyhand has turned to an increasingly popular tactic in the aftermath of Kirk’s assassination: posting a handful of text messages from the slain activist that suggest, at best, that they had a friendly acquaintance. Hollyhand also noted that he interviewed Kirk and then-TPUSA associate Candace Owens when he was still in middle school.

(Screenshot via @brilynhollyhand on Instagram.)

Top Turning Point USA brass haven’t been impressed. And some aren’t sitting back while letting Hollyhand become the face of Gen-Z conservatism.

TPUSA chief operating officer Tyler Bowyer, in particular, has been on a tear against Hollyhand on X, claiming that Hollyhand “let us all down” by supporting then-RNC chief Ronna McDaniel when he was on the RNC’s youth team.

Hollyhand has claimed his current campus tour is “sponsored” by TPUSA, which would seem to lend him a sort of Charlie Kirk 2.0 imprimatur from the organization. But Bowyer counters that Hollyhand separately organized visits to just a few TPUSA chapters, and is now using that fact to falsely claim an association with the organization.

“Although it has come off as distasteful, usually these things work themselves out,” Bowyer tweeted.

Hollyhand’s advocates have offered a relatively light defense of the young man’s aspirations, but their main point is quite reasonable. It is essentially that Hollyhand isn’t really doing anything other influencers on the right aren’t also doing. Right-wing activist Laura Loomer said Hollyhand’s critics on the right were being unfair to a guy who is simply trying to honor Kirk in his own way. As for why he was engendering such hate, Loomer suggested it was driven by envy.

“Don’t be so jealous of him because he comes from money and you don’t,” tweeted.

The End of the American Experiment. 1776 to 2025. - YouTube

The End of the American Experiment. 1776 to 2025. - YouTube

Whoa, well done! A must see and to the end. So stand up and take one in the Family Jewels and get going on the resistance to the Regime. It would take divine intervention for the Democrats to win an election.

Milei’s Argentina needs a financial lifeline

 

Argentinian President Javier Milei is tight on cash, and everyone is mad at him. In an effort to stave off economic collapse, keep the bill collectors at bay, divert attention from a bribery scandal, and calm growing political tension before his country’s midterm elections next month, Milei asked a friend for help.

President Trump met with the chainsaw-wielding leader yesterday (he left the chainsaw at home) at the United Nations General Assembly in New York, where he pledged his full support to the country—but said they don’t need a bailout:

  • Milei’s allyship with the US is working in his favor: Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent promised to offer “all options for stabilization,” including a direct loan.
  • The World Bank said it would speed up sending $4 billion to the country as part of a larger $12 billion package it announced in April.

A drop in the bucket

The continued allyship from Trump and his administration might buy Milei and his ultra-libertarian, free-market plan a little more time, but…it’s not looking good. When Milei was elected in 2023, he promised to bring down inflation from nearly 26% in 2023, which he did. It was 1.9% last month.

But economists say Milei’s strategy—to overvalue the peso against the US dollar—was shortsighted and ultimately devastated Argentina’s economy in other ways.

While Milei anticipated a V-shaped recovery, unemployment has jumped from 5.7% to 7.6% since he took office. Inflating the peso has also tanked economic growth and made it impossible for Argentina’s central bank to replenish its dwindling reserves:

  • Last week, the central bank spent $1.1 billion of the reserve’s $20 billion in just three days to keep the peso’s value up.
  • And next year, the country needs to pay roughly $9.5 billion in debt payments.

The timing couldn’t be worse for Milei: As businesses in the country close and unemployment rises, his approval rating is plummeting ahead of the country’s October midterms, jeopardizing his support in Congress.—MM


Why is Sam Altman losing sleep? OpenAI CEO addresses controversies in interview

Why is Sam Altman losing sleep? OpenAI CEO addresses controversies in interview

Why is Sam Altman losing sleep? OpenAI CEO addresses controversies in sweeping interview
Published Mon, Sep 15 20255:03 AM EDTUpdated 4 Hours Ago

Dylan Butts@in/dylan-b-7a451a107
ShareShare Article via FacebookShare Article via TwitterShare Article via LinkedInShare Article via Email
Key Points
In a sweeping interview last week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman admitted that he hasn’t had “a good night of sleep” since ChatGPT launched in 2022.
The influential CEO addressed a number of dire concerns including how to address suicide, chatbot morality, privacy and other ethical questions.


Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, and Lisa Su, CEO of Advanced Micro Devices, testify during the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee hearing titled “Winning the AI Race: Strengthening U.S. Capabilities in Computing and Innovation,” in Hart building on Thursday, May 8, 2025.
Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images


In a sweeping interview last week, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman addressed a plethora of moral and ethical questions regarding his company and the popular ChatGPT AI model.

“Look, I don’t sleep that well at night. There’s a lot of stuff that I feel a lot of weight on, but probably nothing more than the fact that every day, hundreds of millions of people talk to our model,” Altman told former Fox News host Tucker Carlson in a nearly hour-long interview.


“I don’t actually worry about us getting the big moral decisions wrong,” Altman said, though he admitted “maybe we will get those wrong too.”

Rather, he said he loses the most sleep over the “very small decisions” on model behavior, which can ultimately have big repercussions.

These decisions tend to center around the ethics that inform ChatGPT, and what questions the chatbot does and doesn’t answer. Here’s an outline of some of those moral and ethical dilemmas that appear to be keeping Altman awake at night.
How does ChatGPT address suicide?


According to Altman, the most difficult issue the company is grappling with recently is how ChatGPT approaches suicide, in light of a lawsuit from a family who blamed the chatbot for their teenage son’s suicide.

The CEO said that out of the thousands of people who commit suicide each week, many of them could possibly have been talking to ChatGPT in the lead-up.


“They probably talked about [suicide], and we probably didn’t save their lives,” Altman said candidly. “Maybe we could have said something better. Maybe we could have been more proactive. Maybe we could have provided a little bit better advice about, hey, you need to get this help.”

watch now
VIDEO12:19
Jay Edelson on OpenAI wrongful death lawsuit: We’re putting OpenAI & Sam Altman on trial, not AI



Last month, the parents of Adam Raine filed a product liability and wrongful death suit against OpenAI after their son died by suicide at age 16. In the lawsuit, the family said that “ChatGPT actively helped Adam explore suicide methods.”

Soon after, in a blog post titled “Helping people when they need it most,” OpenAI detailed plans to address ChatGPT’s shortcomings when handling “sensitive situations,” and said it would keep improving its technology to protect people who are at their most vulnerable.
How are ChatGPT’s ethics determined?


Another large topic broached in the sit-down interview was the ethics and morals that inform ChatGPT and its stewards.

While Altman described the base model of ChatGPT as trained on the collective experience, knowledge and learnings of humanity, he said that OpenAI must then align certain behaviors of the chatbot and decide what questions it won’t answer.

“This is a really hard problem. We have a lot of users now, and they come from very different life perspectives... But on the whole, I have been pleasantly surprised with the model’s ability to learn and apply a moral framework.”

When pressed on how certain model specifications are decided, Altman said the company had consulted “hundreds of moral philosophers and people who thought about ethics of technology and systems.”

An example he gave of a model specification made was that ChatGPT will avoid answering questions on how to make biological weapons if prompted by users.

“There are clear examples of where society has an interest that is in significant tension with user freedom,” Altman said, though he added the company “won’t get everything right, and also needs the input of the world” to help make these decisions.
How private is ChatGPT?


Another big discussion topic was the concept of user privacy regarding chatbots, with Carlson arguing that generative AI could be used for “totalitarian control.”

In response, Altman said one piece of policy he has been pushing for in Washington is “AI privilege,” which refers to the idea that anything a user says to a chatbot should be completely confidential.

“When you talk to a doctor about your health or a lawyer about your legal problems, the government cannot get that information, right?... I think we should have the same concept for AI.”

watch now
VIDEO02:35
OpenAI CEO Sam Altman on path to profitability: Willing to run at a loss to focus on growth



According to Altman, that would allow users to consult AI chatbots about their medical history and legal problems, among other things. Currently, U.S. officials can subpoena the company for user data, he added.

“I think I feel optimistic that we can get the government to understand the importance of this,” he said.
Will ChatGPT be used in military operations?


Asked by Carlson if ChatGPT would be used by the military to harm humans, Altman didn’t provide a direct answer.

“I don’t know the way that people in the military use ChatGPT today... but I suspect there’s a lot of people in the military talking to ChatGPT for advice.”

Later, he added that he wasn’t sure “exactly how to feel about that.”

OpenAI was one of the AI companies that received a $200 million contract from the U.S. Department of Defense to put generative AI to work for the U.S. military. The firm said in a blog post that it would provide the U.S. government access to custom AI models for national security, support and product roadmap information.
Just how powerful is OpenAI?


Carlson, in his interview, predicted that on its current trajectory, generative AI and by extension, Sam Altman, could amass more power than any other person, going so far as to call ChatGPT a “religion.”

In response, Altman said he used to worry a lot about the concentration of power that could result from generative AI, but he now believes that AI will result in “a huge up leveling” of all people.

Phishing, battery, and speed improvements | Proton VPN

May 2025: Phishing, battery, and speed improvements | Proton VPN





An even better NetShield plus browse faster and longer

We recently published our roadmap for spring and summer 2025 to showcase the exciting updates to our service that are heading your way. Now, with spring only just underway, we’d like to share with you recent improvements that will make your online life more safe, more private, and more productive.

NetShield Ad-blocker blocks more phishing attempts

NetShield Ad-blocker in action

Are you worried about falling for a phishing attack? We’ve expanded the list used by our NetShield Ad-blocker DNS filtering feature so that it now blocks almost all known phishing(new window) domains. Simply turn NetShield on for peace of mind, knowing that if you accidentally visit a site that contains phishing scripts, it simply won’t load.

AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers | MIT Technology Review

AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers | MIT Technology Review


AI models are using material from retracted scientific papers


Some companies are working to remedy the issue.
By Ananyaarchive page
September 23, 2025
Stephanie Arnett/MIT Technology Review | Adobe Stock, Getty Images

Some AI chatbots rely on flawed research from retracted scientific papers to answer questions, according to recent studies. The findings, confirmed by MIT Technology Review, raise questions about how reliable AI tools are at evaluating scientific research and could complicate efforts by countries and industries seeking to invest in AI tools for scientists.

AI search tools and chatbots are already known to fabricate links and references. But answers based on the material from actual papers can mislead as well if those papers have been retracted. The chatbot is “using a real paper, real material, to tell you something,” says Weikuan Gu, a medical researcher at the University of Tennessee in Memphis and an author of one of the recent studies. But, he says, if people only look at the content of the answer and do not click through to the paper and see that it’s been retracted, that’s really a problem.


Gu and his team asked OpenAI’s ChatGPT, running on the GPT-4o model, questions based on information from 21 retracted papers on medical imaging. The chatbot’s answers referenced retracted papers in five cases but advised caution in only three. While it cited non-retracted papers for other questions, the authors note it may not have recognized the retraction status of the articles. In a study from August, a different group of researchers used ChatGPT-4o mini to evaluate the quality of 217 retracted and low-quality papers from different scientific fields; they found that none of the chatbot’s responses mentioned retractions or other concerns. (No similar studies have been released on GPT-5, which came out this August.)

The public uses AI chatbots to ask for medical advice and diagnose health conditions. Students and scientists increasingly use science-focused AI tools to review existing scientific literature and summarize papers. That kind of usage is likely to increase. The US National Science Foundation, for instance, invested $75 million in building AI models for science research this August.