Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

The Court That Let Democracy Bleed

The Court That Let Democracy Bleed MeidasTouch Network and Michael Cohen Jul 15, 2025 Guest article by Michael Cohen In a chilling, unsigne...

Like dictators before him, Trump threatens international peace and security

Like dictators before him, Trump threatens international peace and security

At first, Canadians just shook their collective heads when United States President Donald Trump suggested Canada become the 51st American state.

They rolled their eyes when he posted a fake image of himself standing next to a Canadian flag amid snowy mountaintops — in actuality, the Swiss Alps.

Another Trump post showed a map purporting to merge Canada and the U.S. That prompted Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to respond on social media that there was not a “snowball’s chance in hell” that Canadians would soon become Americans.

Meme wars are one thing, but in the real world, threatening the sovereignty and territorial integrity of a foreign state is quite another. Canadian leaders have stopped laughing, and they now need to situate Trump’s dangerous rhetoric in the language of international law and state-to-state relations.

As a former Canadian ambassador to the Netherlands, and a permanent representative to the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons and international courts and tribunals in The Hague, I know language matters.

Trump’s threats make it an opportune time to provide a brief snapshot of the historical context for Trump’s rhetoric, and the necessary 21st-century vocabulary with which to respond and shape the public discourse.

Manifest Destiny

In threatening hefty tariffs on Canada, Trump cited the flow of fentanyl over the Canada-U.S. border, but it was clear it had little to do with fentanyl, particularly since so little crosses the border into the U.S. Instead, it seems he is coming for Canada’s sovereignty as an independent state.

When asked on Feb. 3 how Canada could ward off tariffs, Trump reiterated: “What I’d like to see is Canada become our 51st state.”

Later that same day, Trump paused tariffs on Canada, ostensibly thanks to border measures that Canada, like Mexico, had already announced. But what is still being said by the president of one of the most powerful nations on Earth cannot be unsaid.

At a Jan. 7 news conference, Trump called the border between Canada and the U.S. an “artificially drawn line” — echoing rhetoric deployed by Vladimir Putin as justification for Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. His remarks, in fact, were gleefully retweeted by Russia’s propaganda channel RT.

Putin claims the Ukrainian border is the result of “administrative” action under the former Soviet Union, while Trump appears to be invoking the 19th century American concept of “Manifest Destiny.”

He used the phrase verbatim in his inaugural address in the context of planting a flag on Mars, but it is entirely consistent with his plans for, and rhetoric on, Canada.

As John O'Sullivan, the American diplomat who coined the phrase, wrote in a 1845 article entitled Annexation, it’s America’s destiny to “overspread the continent.” Trump appears to be taking that idea to heart.

‘The free white race’

Arguably the biggest fan of territorial expansion in the 20th century was Adolf Hitler, architect of the Third Reich. Trump reportedly has some of Hitler’s writings on his bedside table. Hitler had this to say in Chapter 4 of Mein Kampf:

“The extent of the national territory is a determining factor in the external security of the nation. The larger the territory which a people has at its disposal, the stronger are the national defences of that people.”

Sound familiar?

But why Canada and not Mexico, you may ask? Likely because he considers Canada less racialized, even though modern-day Canada has a large multicultural population.


Read more: Trump has put down his racist dog whistle and picked up a bull horn


In 1848, however, in the midst of the American expansionist era, pro-slavery South Carolina Sen. John Calhoun said:

“We have never dreamt of incorporating into our Union any but the Caucasian race — the free white race. To incorporate Mexico, would be the very first instance of the kind, of incorporating an Indian race; for more than half of the Mexicans are Indians, and the other is composed chiefly of mixed tribes. I protest against such a union as that! Ours, sir, is the Government of a white race.”

In short, neither the context nor the history informing Trump’s designs on Canada are reassuring for Canadians.

Rules still matter

Trump’s dismissive approach to established borders ignores fundamental norms and principles on the sovereignty, equality and territorial integrity of states, codified following the Second World War in the Charter of the United Nations. Canada is a founding member of the UN; its status as a sovereign state is not subject to challenge under international law.

The charter clearly states that “all Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”

Similarly, the North Atlantic Treaty obliges NATO member states to “refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.”


Read more: Allies or enemies? Trump's threats against Canada and Greenland put NATO in a tough spot


Trump has said he will use “economic force” to annex Canada. The suggestion that an economically devastated Canada could be sufficiently brought to heel has been embraced by the so-called MAGA-sphere, including an influential blogger with ties to Russia.

International law

Threatening economic rather than military force does not make Trump’s efforts at subjugating Canada any more acceptable in terms of international law.

In 1970, in the UN’s Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-Operations Among States, the UN General Assembly unanimously confirmed that “no state may use … economic, political or any other type of measures to coerce another state in order to obtain from it the subordination of its exercise of its sovereign rights.” While not legally binding, this declaration represents customary international law.

In 1986, the International Court of Justice ruled in Nicaragua v, United States that:

“A prohibited intervention must accordingly be one bearing on matters in which each State is permitted, by the principle of State sovereignty, to decide freely. One of these is the choice of a political, economic, social and cultural system, and the formulation of foreign policy. Intervention is wrongful when it uses methods of coercion in regard to such choices, which must remain free ones.”

Keeping score

It’s both right and righteous for our elected leaders to say that Canada will never be the 51st state.

But the time has come, especially in the context of Trump’s threats to buy Greenland, seize the Panama Canal and turn Gaza into a Middle Eastern Riviera, to call out his threats to Canada.

Amid Trump’s dizzying litany of outlandish pronouncements, Canada’s leaders must keep track of what Trump’s declarations represent:

  • A threat to international peace and security;
  • A threat to the sovereignty and territorial integrity of Canada;
  • Unlawful coercion and intervention in the affairs of a sovereign state;
  • A breach of the UN Charter;
  • A breach of the North Atlantic treaty.

Trump’s threats are no way to treat an ally, but unfortunately for him, international law is on Canada’s side.

Sabine Nolke does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Javier Milei in hot water over memecoin collapse

 

President Javier Milei of Argentina

Luis Robayo/Getty Images

What do the leader of a country with over 46 million people and the host of the Talk Tuah podcast have in common? After this weekend, both Argentina President Javier Milei and internet celebrity Haliey Welch will forever be associated with memecoins and rug pulls.

The libertarian Milei promoted $LIBRA in a post on X late Friday, saying, “This is a private project dedicated to encouraging the growth of the Argentine economy.” Hours later, after it had risen to a market cap of $4.4 billion, it crashed in value by more than 95%. Milei then deleted his post and said he was not familiar with the details of the project.

Setting a President: This move by Milei follows in the footsteps of US President Donald Trump, who launched a memecoin not long before his inauguration in January.

What’s next? One political faction wants the Argentinian Congress to investigate what a center-left opposition group called “a scandal without precedent,” while Milei himself has said he will also look into whether any laws were broken. Lawmakers have also raised the possibility of an impeachment hearing for Milei.

8,000 pregnant women may die in just 90 days because of US aid cuts

8,000 pregnant women may die in just 90 days because of US aid cuts This article first appeared in The Checkup, MIT Technology Review’s weekly biotech newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Thursday, and read articles like this first, sign up here. Yesterday marks a month since the inauguration of Donald Trump as the 47th US president. And what a month it has been. The Trump administration wasted no time in delivering a slew of executive orders, memos, and work notices to federal employees. On February 18, Trump signed an executive order that seeks to make IVF more accessible to people in the US. In some ways, the move isn’t surprising—Trump has expressed his support for the technology in the past, and even called himself “the father of IVF” while on the campaign trail last year. Making IVF more affordable and accessible should give people more options when it comes to family planning and reproductive freedom more generally. But the move comes after a barrage of actions by the new administration that are hitting reproductive care hard for people around the world. On January 20, his first day in office, Trump ordered a “90-day pause in United States foreign development assistance” for such programs to be assessed. By January 24, a “stop work” memo issued by the State Department brought US-funded aid programs around the world to a halt. Recent estimates suggest that more than 8,000 women will die from complications related to pregnancy and childbirth over the next 90 days if the funding is not reinstated. On January 24 Trump also reinstated the global gag rule—a policy that requires nongovernmental organizations receiving US health funding to agree that they will not offer abortion counseling and care. This move alone immediately stripped organizations of the funding they need to perform their work. MSI Reproductive Choices, which offers support for reproductive health care in 36 countries, lost $14 million as a result, says Anna Mackay, who manages donor-funded programs at the organization. “Over 2 million women and girls would have received contraceptive services with that money,” she says. The US Agency for International Development (USAID) had a 2025 budget of $42.8 billion to spend on foreign assistance, which covers everything from humanitarian aid and sanitation to programs promoting gender equality and economic growth in countries around the world. But the “stop work” memo froze that funding for 90 days. The impacts were felt immediately and are still rippling out. Clinical trials were halted. Jobs were lost. Health programs were shut down. “I think this is going to have a devastating impact on the global health architecture,” says Thoai Ngo at Columbia University’s Mailman School of Public Health. “USAID is the major foreign funder for global health … I’m afraid that there isn’t [another government] that can fill the gap.” Reproductive health care is likely to lose out as affected governments and health organizations try to reorganize their resources, says Ngo: “In times of crisis … women and girls tend to be deprioritized in terms of access to health and social services.” Without information on and access to a range of contraceptive options, unintended pregnancies result. These have the potential to limit the freedoms of people who become pregnant. And they can have far-reaching economic impacts, since access to contraception can improve education rates and career outcomes. And the health consequences can be devastating. Unintended pregnancies are more likely to be ended with abortions—potentially unsafe ones. Maternal death rates are high in regions that lack adequate resources. A maternal death occurred every two minutes in 2020. “It’s difficult to overstate how catastrophic this freeze has been over the last several weeks,” says Amy Friedrich-Karnik, director of federal policy at the Guttmacher Institute, a research and policy organization focused on global sexual and reproductive health and rights. “Every single day that the freeze is in place, there are 130,000 women who are being denied contraceptive care,” she says. The Guttmacher Institute estimates that should USAID funding be frozen for the full 90 days, around 11.7 million women and girls would lose access to contraceptive care, and 4.2 million of them would experience unintended pregnancies. Of those, “8,340 will die from complications during pregnancy and childbirth,” says Friedrich-Karnik. “By denying people access to contraception, not only are you denying them tools for their bodily autonomy—you are really risking their lives,” she says. “Thousands more women will die down the road.” “USAID plays such a central role in supporting these life-saving programs,” says Ngo. “The picture is bleak.” Even online sources of information on contraceptives are being affected by the funding freeze. Ben Bellows is a chief business officer at Nivi, a digital health company that develops chatbots to deliver health information to people via WhatsApp. “Two million users have used the bot,” he says. He and his team have been working on a project to deliver information on contraceptive options and family planning to women in India, and they have been looking to incorporate AI into their bot. The project was funded by a company that, in turn, is funded by USAID. Like the funding, the work is “frozen,” says Bellows. “We’ve slowed [hiring] and we’ve slowed some of the tech development because of the freeze [on USAID],” he says. “It’s bad [for] the individuals, it’s bad [for] the companies that are trying to operate in these markets, and it’s bad [for] public health outcomes.” Reproductive health and freedoms are also likely to be affected by the Trump administration’s cuts to federal agencies. The National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have been in the administration’s crosshairs, as has the Food and Drug Administration. After all, the FDA regulates drugs and medical devices in the US, including contraceptives. The CDC collects and shares important data on sexual and reproductive health. And the NIH supports vital research on reproductive health and contraception. The CDC also funds health programs in low-income countries like Ethiopia. Following Trump’s executive order, the country’s ministry of health terminated the contracts of more than 5,000 health workers whose salaries were supported by the CDC as well as USAID. “That’s midwives and nurses working in rural health posts,” says Mackay. “We’re turning up to support these staff and provide them with sexual reproductive health training and make sure they’ve got the contraceptives, and there’s just no one at the facility.” So, yes, it is great news if the Trump administration can find a way to make IVF more accessible. But, as Mackay points out, “it’s increasing reproductive choice in one direction.” Now read the rest of The Checkup Read more from MIT Technology Review‘s archive Last November, two years after Roe v. Wade was overturned, 10 US states voted on abortion rights. Seven of them voted to extend and protect access. My colleague Rhiannon Williams reported on the immediate aftermath of the decision that reversed Roe v. Wade. Fertility rates are falling around the world, in almost every country. IVF is great, but it won’t save us from a looming fertility crisis. Gender equality and family-friendly policies are much more likely to be effective. Decades of increasingly successful IVF treatments have caused millions of embryos to be stored in cryopreservation tanks around the world. In some cases, they can’t be donated, used, or destroyed and appear to be stuck in limbo “forever.” Ever come across the term “women of childbearing age”? The insidious idea that women’s bodies are, above all else, vessels for growing children has plenty of negative consequences for us all. But it has also set back scientific research and health policy. There are other WhatsApp-based approaches to improving access to health information in India. Accredited social health activists in the country are using the platform to counter medical misinformation and superstitions around pregnancy. From around the web The US Food and Drug Administration assesses the efficacy and toxicity of experimental medicines before they are approved. It should also consider their “financial toxicity,” given that medical bills can fall on the shoulders of patients themselves, argue a group of US doctors. (The New England Journal of Medicine) Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the new US secretary of health and human services, has vowed to investigate the country’s childhood vaccination schedule. During his confirmation hearing a couple of weeks ago, he promised not to change the schedule. (Associated Press) Some scientists have been altering their published work without telling anyone. Such “stealth corrections” threaten scientific integrity, say a group of researchers from Europe and the US. (Learned Publishing) The US Department of Agriculture said it accidentally fired several people who were working on the federal response to the bird flu outbreak. Apparently the agency is now trying to hire them back. (NBC News) Could your next pet be a glowing rabbit? This startup is using CRISPR to “level up” pets. Their goal is to eventually create a real-life unicorn. (Wired)

NIH cuts med research budgets

 

Entrance sign of medical building at UPMC Oakland Campus in University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Medical building at UPMC Oakland Campus, University of Pittsburgh. Aimintang/Getty Images

The National Institutes of Health today will begin implementing sweeping cuts to overhead funding for research grants. The cuts, announced Friday, will save taxpayers more than $4 billion, according to the NIH. Scientists have pushed back forcefully, saying that slashing the budget will halt progress on lifesaving medical innovations and imperil jobs, medical research institutions, and regional economies that depend on NIH funding.

The NIH is an economic force

It’s the leading funder of biomedical research in the world and supports 412,000 jobs, according to United for Medical Research, a biomedical research advocacy organization.

Overhead costs at the center of budget cuts: When the NIH awards a grant to a scientist, an additional percentage of that award is provided to the scientist’s institution to pay for infrastructure that supports the research—lab equipment, utilities, hazardous waste disposal, and more. Of the $35 billion awarded to grants in FY 2023, $9 billion (26%) went to “indirect costs,” per the NIH.

That will now be capped at 15%: Under the new Trump administration, the NIH announced that it would cap its funding of indirect costs to 15%, pointing to high indirect rates of 69%, 67.5%, and 63.7%, which have been awarded to ultrawealthy institutions Harvard, Yale, and Johns Hopkins, respectively. The NIH said it was targeting wasteful spending: It is “vital to ensure that as many funds as possible go towards direct scientific research costs rather than administrative overhead.”

Scientists denounced the cuts

They responded that overhead costs such as cutting-edge microscopes and HVAC are vital to research, and a 15% cap would threaten the development of treatments for diseases like cancer, the top category for NIH funding.

It could also ripple across the economy. For every $1 of research funding, the NIH generated $2.46 in economic activity, according to United for Medical Research. And the cuts would disproportionately impact cities and regions that are hubs for biomedical research, like Birmingham, AL, and the Research Triangle in NC. Pittsburgh, for instance, has built a thriving “meds and eds”-based economy in Western PA. Under the new policy, the University of Pittsburgh would receive $183 million less in government research funding, a 25% reduction.

Watch Out. The Plague Years Start Now - Canada Food imports at risk

Donald Trump has destroyed US public health with breathtaking speed. Here’s what’s coming next, and how Canada can prepare. Watch Out. The Plague Years Start Now Ill-timed cuts to health services Observers quickly noted that such cuts were ill-timed, since the United States is currently facing an ongoing H5N1 avian flu outbreak in both poultry and dairy cattle, a severe flu season with 24 million cases and 13,000 deaths, a serious tuberculosis outbreak in Kansas and measles outbreaks in Texas, Georgia, Alaska, Rhode Island, New York City and New Mexico. In related news, just as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was confirmed as U.S. secretary of health and human services, Dr. Jeremy Faust, an emergency medicine physician at Brigham and Women’s Hospital in Boston who teaches at Harvard Medical School, noted that the state of Louisiana will no longer promote mass vaccinations. Dr. Faust also pointed out that the Trump-ordered “Make America Healthy Again Commission” did not even mention the two chief causes of U.S. children’s deaths — firearms and automobiles. Dismantling USAID and threatening millions While most of these measures chiefly affect Americans, Trump also began dismantling the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID. Its 10,000 employees were reduced to 290. Trump referred to its leadership as “radical left lunatics,” while his State Department ordered the freeze of all programs — including the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, a program created by President George W. Bush that provides life-saving HIV-AIDS medication and treatment for 20 million people, including 500,000 children, worldwide. A Trump-appointed judge issued a temporary restraining order against the freeze, and Doctors Without Borders warned that uncertainty about PEPFAR has compromised its ability to prevent new HIV-AIDS cases. The question inevitably arises: What nation would do this to itself? And what is all this in the name of? “Efficiency”? “Cutting waste”? “Saving tax dollars”? These are pretexts, lies made by known liars like Donald Trump. They’re not even for the gullible voters who might believe them; they’re intended to remind skeptical voters that Trump can do this, lie to them and get away with it. Dismantling U.S. health science will have other effects besides the simple display of unchecked power. Research funds that would have gone to thousands of universities and laboratories will cease, forcing project cancellations and layoffs of highly skilled scientists and technicians. Many leading universities may not survive the loss of research funding. That will be convenient for the Trump regime. U.S. university towns have dramatically moved left in the past 25 years, even in Republican-dominated states. A financial crisis in universities will force their faculty and staff to spend their time hunting for new jobs rather than digging up information on health threats. In his first term, Trump discouraged case counts as COVID-19 spread; his premise was that if you don’t count it, it doesn’t count. Meanwhile, Kennedy as the head of Health and Human Services will be able to downplay outbreaks as mere rumours while calling attention to imaginary vaccine hazards — further confusing and alarming both health-care providers and their patients.

ICE Enforcement Official Tapped to Lead Unaccompanied Migrant Children Office, Triggering Alarms

ICE Enforcement Official Tapped to Lead Unaccompanied Migrant Children Office, Triggering Alarms

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

A longtime immigration enforcement official has been tapped to run the agency responsible for managing unaccompanied migrant children, in a move that has alarmed experts and advocates who are concerned that information about children and their families will be shared for arrests and deportations.

For the past two decades, an office within the Department of Health and Human Services has supervised children who cross the border without a parent or legal guardian. The government handed this duty to the Office of Refugee Resettlement, not its immigration enforcement agency, underscoring that the process shouldn’t be punitive but instead is meant to help safely place children with sponsors living in the United States.

That wall eroded during President Donald Trump’s first administration, when the ORR began to share identifying information about unaccompanied children and their potential sponsors with Immigration and Customs Enforcement, presaging a wave of arrests. Congress put limits on this sharing and President Joe Biden stopped the practice — but a new hire in Trump’s second administration has advocates and experts worried the separation between the agencies is once again breaking down.

Mellissa Harper, a veteran immigration enforcement officer at ICE, has been tapped to lead the ORR, according to three current and former government officials, and oversee the care of unaccompanied migrant children. The officials requested anonymity to discuss government operations. Her position is a federal detail, according to a federal employee directory, which allows career government employees to transfer between agencies for temporary roles.

This appears to be the first time an ICE official has been hired to lead the refugee resettlement office, former administration officials told ProPublica. Harper’s experience mostly comprises immigration enforcement. A former ICE official said Harper has a good reputation inside the agency and expertise dealing with issues involving minors across the government.

A review of legal documents shows that her tenure has been marked with litigation alleging violations of immigration law. While she was leading the unit within ICE overseeing minors and families, the agency was subject to a 2018 class-action lawsuit that challenged the transfer of teenagers into adult detention facilities on their 18th birthdays.

She led the family unit in 2018, when the administration implemented its “zero tolerance” immigration policy and separated thousands of migrant children from their parents. The former ICE official said that, during zero tolerance, the unit was not making separation decisions but did have a role providing transportation of minors and coordination of their immigration cases.

HHS, under which the refugee office sits, did not respond to ProPublica’s emailed questions, citing “a pause on mass communications and public appearances that are not directly related to emergencies or critical to preserving health.”

Harper did not respond to ProPublica’s emailed questions. The Trump administration and ICE also did not respond to requests for comment.

Harper has worked at ICE since 2007, most recently leading the enforcement and removal operations field office in New Orleans.

Her new role appears to be a part of the administration’s “desire to ensure enforcement against both unaccompanied kids and their sponsors,” said Scott Shuchart, who served at ICE as a political appointee during the Biden administration.

In the past, he said, some smugglers have encouraged migrants to send their children across the border alone — knowing that, under U.S. law, they have to be taken into ORR custody and released to sponsors. That scenario pushed up the number of kids arriving by themselves, he said. Once released, they can apply for asylum and other immigration relief in the U.S., a process that can take months or years to resolve.

Cases have emerged of children who have ended up working illegally, sometimes in dangerous jobs, after being released from ORR custody to sponsors. In one high-profile 2015 case, unaccompanied minors from Guatemala were allegedly trafficked to work on an Ohio egg farm.

Republicans have called out the agency for not providing adequate protections to prevent those types of cases. Amid a flurry of executive orders Trump issued after taking office on Jan. 20, one administration directive said HHS should share “any information necessary” to stop trafficking and smuggling of migrant children.

During the first Trump administration, the ORR drew scrutiny after it started to share information with ICE about children and their adult sponsors in 2018. Using this information, the immigration enforcement agency arrested around 300 people, which led many sponsors to fear interaction with the refugee agency and contributed to many children staying in custody for longer.

Congress put limits on the information sharing and Biden revoked the practice. Last December, his administration issued a notice stating “ORR is not an immigration enforcement agency and does not maintain records for immigration enforcement purposes."

Harper’s appointment comes after the authors of Project 2025, the playbook developed by conservative groups to serve as a policy blueprint for the Trump administration, recommended transferring the welfare unit under the authority of the Department of Homeland Security and eliminating a key legal settlement that established standards for the treatment of detained immigrant children.

Scrutinized Oversight of Minors

Harper’s direction of the Juvenile and Family Residential Management Unit within ICE had previously come under scrutiny.

In March 2018, the immigration agency faced a class-action lawsuit from a group of teenagers who were transferred out of ORR custody on their 18th birthdays into adult ICE detention facilities. The plaintiffs alleged they had been illegally transferred without consideration of less restrictive placements, in violation of federal law.

Two years later, U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras determined that ICE had violated the law. In his 180-page statement of findings, he referenced Harper — or her testimony on how she ran her unit — more than 160 times.

The court issued a five-year permanent injunction, requiring the immigration agency to comply with federal law by considering the placement of these teenagers in less restrictive settings than detention facilities. The court also mandated the agency retrain its officers and revise its policies on how they determine custody for children when they turn 18.

In October 2022, one month after the judge approved a final settlement agreement in the class-action case, Harper became the director of the ICE field office in New Orleans, according to her LinkedIn profile.

The year the case was filed, an ICE spokesperson told a reporter that the agency was in compliance with legal standards and agency policy. Neither ICE nor Harper responded to ProPublica’s questions regarding the case or its settlement.

Now, advocates question whether such issues will resurface.

“When Congress decided over 20 years ago to move unaccompanied children out of the custody of the enforcement side of federal immigration, it did so with the clear intention to prioritize child welfare principles,” said Neha Desai, a senior director of immigration at the National Center for Youth Law.

“Unaccompanied children are uniquely vulnerable and should be treated as children, not Criminals.”

Do You Work for the Federal Government? ProPublica Wants to Hear From You.

Pratheek Rebala contributed research.

Tom Hartmann

  TRUMP LOST. Vote Suppression Won. Former BBC, Guardian, etc., investigative reporter published here on Hartmann Report his comprehensive analysis of how Republicans essentially rigged the 2024 election by selectively and methodically, over a period of decades — but particularly during the years since 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court gutted the 1965 Civil Rights Act — purging people from voting lists, refusing to count their mail-in ballots, and giving people in Blue areas “placebo” provisional ballots that never get counted. He opens the article with:

Trump lost. That is, if all legal voters were allowed to vote, if all legal ballots were counted, Trump would have lost the states of Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Vice-President Kamala Harris would have won the Presidency with 286 electoral votes.

And, if not for the mass purge of voters of color, if not for the mass disqualification of provisional and mail-in ballots, if not for the new mass “vigilante” challenges in swing states, Harris would have gained at least another 3,565,000 votes, topping Trump’s official popular vote tally by 1.2 million.

Even though the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 explicitly states that all American citizens have a right to vote, Republicans on the Supreme Court have both ignored and blocked that assertion by Congress to claim, instead, that voting in America is a mere privilege that can be given or taken on a whim.

If a state wants to take away your gun — which 5 Republicans on the Supreme Court say you have a right to own — they’d have to go to court and get a court order or warrant. But if they want to take away your vote, they don’t even need to tell you.

America is the only developed country in the world where either of these two insanities are law, and it’s 100% because Republicans love guns (and gun manufacturers’ money) and hate the vote when its exercised by people likely to be Democrats (college students, racial and religious minorities, urban dwellers, and Social Security age people).

Democrats tried to fix this by establishing an absolute right to vote with the John Lewis Voting Rights Act in 2022, but Kirsten Sinema and Joe Manchin stabbed them (and the country) in the back by refusing to break a Republican filibuster, even though it had 51 votes in the Senate. The next time Democrats have power, this must be job one!

Leave a comment

— GOP introduces an Amendment allowing Trump to run for a third term — but not Obama. Say What?! Tennessee Republican Congressman Andy Ogles has introduced legislation into the House to amend the Constitution to allow Trump to run for a third term, but not Obama. His proposed amendment raises the number of terms that can be served from 2 to 3, but only if the first two terms were not served consecutively. Just by coincidence, the only living past president that would apply to is Trump. This has no chance of passing, but it at least tells us how deeply Ogles and his colleagues are buried within the Trump cult. This is not a good sign for a Republican return to sanity in our republic…

— Trump threatens to “get rid” of emergency agency FEMA and tells states to “take care” of disasters themselves. Ignoring the fact that FEMA already reimburses states for the cost of disaster assistance and recovery, Trump suggested yesterday while visiting Hurricane Helene damage in North Carolina that states should pick up their own recovery costs and “then be reimbursed by the federal government,” but not by FEMA. The kicker here is that when FEMA distributes disaster aid it’s obligated to, within the limits of disaster declarations, treat all states the same. On the other hand, if Trump only wanted to provide aid to Red states and let Blue states drown in crisis and debt, all he has to do is shift disaster aid to the military, and then pick and choose which states he’ll provide military aid to. Is that what’s behind his comments, or is he just misinformed? I’d never bet against Trump’s ability to be petty, vindictive, and to want to punish states that didn’t vote for him.

— “Shove it”: Canadians revolt after Trump says they'd have better health care as 51st state. Trump’s been trolling Canada for a few months now, suggesting they should become our 51st state by way of ratifying Putin’s and Xi’s view against the rigidity and international acknowledgement of national borders. Canadians, however, don’t find it at all funny. And when Trump said this week that, as the 51st state they’d have “better healthcare,” he really stepped in it. As Brad Reed noted at Raw Story, Canadians reacted quickly on social media: “I quite like my universal healthcare,” wrote retired nurse and Toronto resident Pamela Meyer. “No thanks. As a Canadian... LMAO,” wrote YouTube influencer David Doel. “Shove it up your a--,” wrote one self-professed fan of the Edmonton Oilers. “We don’t want to be you. Not a chance in hell would Canadians be better off with this ‘deal,’” wrote Natalie Dionne on BlueSky: “Eff off eh.” Ah, those ever-polite Canadians! :)

— How the 2 percent of bitcoin owners who own 90% of all bitcoin in circulation are planning to use Trump to make a killing. A small handful of people own about 90% of all bitcoin in circulation, according to Lever News, and they threw hundreds of millions into electing Trump. Now the career criminal — who just released a meme coin and whose sons are entering the crypto business — is apparently pushing to use our tax dollars to fund a “crypto strategic reserve.” Doing that could easily increase the price of a single bitcoin from the current ~$100K to over a million dollars each, giving this group a massive, multi-billion-dollar windfall. And, if he does it the way it looks like he’s planning, Trump and his kids could make billions off the deal. America is on the verge of becoming the single most corrupt developed nation in the world, which is not a distinction we should be proud of or even tolerate.

— Hakeem Jefferies says Democrats won't help Republicans raise the debt ceiling or cut taxes even more on billionaires. Will they hold the line? For Trump and his Republicans in Congress to again cut taxes on billionaires and put it on our kids’ credit card (the US Treasury), they’ll first have to get enough votes to get a debt ceiling suspension or increase passed. The problem for them — unless Trump is stronger than most believe — is that there’s a large handful of “deficit hawks” in the GOP in both the House and Senate who may well oppose another Two Santas’ round. Which would mean that Mike Johnson and perhaps John Thune will need Democratic votes to make these things happen. House minority leader Hakeem Jefferies just put the kibosh on that, saying: “What we are not willing to do is to enable extreme MAGA Republicans to have a blank check so they can enact massive tax breaks for billionaires and wealthy corporations and make working-class Americans pay for it through cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, Veterans Benefits, or Nutritional. The ball is in the Republicans’ court right now.” Will Democrats hold a hard line, or will a few break and help out the GOP? Without them, will Republicans inflict a government shutdown on themselves? Will John Fetterman turn into the next Joe Manchin? Stay tuned…

— A Black kid — a school shooter this week — decided to kill a classmate (and wound another) and then himself after watching Candice Owens’ online rightwing propaganda convincing him that he’s no good cause he’s Black. This is the kind of damage racist white supremacist propaganda — even when promoted by befuddled Black people — destroys young Black people, particularly young Black men. Before his murder/suicide, 17-year-old Solomon Henderson allegedly wrote, “Candace Owens has influenced me above all; each time she spoke I was stunned by her insights and her own views helped push me further and further into the belief of violence over the Jewish question. … I was so miserable. I wanted to kill myself. I just couldn’t take anymore. I am a worthless subhuman, a living, breathing disgrace.” Racism and antisemitism are psychological, emotional, and political poison. While we can regulate them in newspapers and on TV/radio, Section 230 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 relieves social media billionaires of any liability whatsoever for the contents posted on their platforms. That has to change.

— A Mississippi legislator just introduced legislation outlawing male masturbation unless it is done specifically for the purpose of producing a baby (like for artificial insemination). “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation,” State Representative Bradford Blackmon wrote, adding, “This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation.” It’s about time somebody pointed out the hypocrisy of the GOP…

 Hunter in a Farmer’s World:

“People Will Die”: The Trump Administration Said It Lifted Its Ban on Lifesaving Humanitarian Aid. That’s Not True.

“People Will Die”: The Trump Administration Said It Lifted Its Ban on Lifesaving Humanitarian Aid. That’s Not True.

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

On Friday morning, the staffers at a half dozen U.S.-funded medical facilities in Sudan who care for severely malnourished children had a choice to make: Defy President Donald Trump’s order to immediately stop their operations or let up to 100 babies and toddlers die.

They chose the children.

In spite of the order, they will keep their facilities open for as long as they can, according to three people with direct knowledge of the situation. The people requested anonymity for fear that the administration might target their group for reprisals. Trump’s order also meant they would stop receiving new, previously approved funds to cover salaries, IV bags and other supplies. They said it’s a matter of days, not weeks, before they run out.

American-funded aid organizations around the globe, charged with providing lifesaving care for the most desperate and vulnerable populations imaginable, have for days been forced to completely halt their operations, turn away patients and lay off staff following a series of sudden stop-work demands from the Trump administration. Despite an announcement earlier this week ostensibly allowing lifesaving operations to continue, those earlier orders have not been rescinded.

Many groups doing such lifesaving work either don’t know the right way to request an exemption to the order, known as a waiver, or have no sense of where their request stands. They’ve received little information from the U.S. government, where, in recent days, humanitarian officials have been summarily ousted or prohibited from communicating with the aid organizations.

Trump’s rapid assault on the international aid system is quickly becoming the most consequential and far-reaching shift in U.S. humanitarian policy since the Marshall Plan to rebuild Europe after World War II, aid groups and government officials warned.

Among the programs that remain grounded as of Friday: emergency medical care for displaced Palestinians and Yemenis fleeing war, heat and electricity for Ukrainian refugees and HIV treatment and mpox surveillance in Africa.

Experts in and out of government have anxiously watched the fluid situation develop. “I’ve been an infectious disease doctor for 30 years, and I’ve never seen anything that scares me as much as this,” said Dr. Jennifer Furin, a Harvard Medical School physician who received a stop-work order for a program designing treatment plans for people with the most drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis. Infectious diseases do not know borders, she pointed out. “It’s terrifying.”

Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio first issued the freeze on aid operations last Friday, which included limited exemptions. “The pause on all foreign assistance means a complete halt,” a top adviser wrote in an internal memo to staff. (The order was separate from Trump’s now-seemingly rescinded moratorium on domestic U.S. grants.) Aid groups across the globe began receiving emails that instructed them to immediately stop working while the government conducted a 90-day review of their programs to make sure they aligned with the administration’s agenda.

Trump campaigned on an “America First” platform after unsuccessfully trying to slash the foreign assistance budget during his first term in office. The U.S. provides about $60 billion in nonmilitary humanitarian and development aid annually — less than 1% of the federal budget, but far more than any other country. The complex network of organizations who carry out the work is managed by the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development.

Over the weekend, that system came to a standstill. There was widespread chaos and confusion as contractors scrambled to understand seemingly arbitrary orders from Washington and figure out how to get a waiver to continue working. By Tuesday evening, Trump and Rubio appeared to heed the international pressure and scale back the order by announcing that any “lifesaving” humanitarian efforts would be allowed to continue.

Aid groups that specialize in saving lives were relieved and thought their stop-work orders would be reversed just as swiftly as they had arrived.

But that hasn’t happened. Instead, more stop-work orders have been issued. As of Thursday, contractors worldwide were still grounded under the original orders and unable to secure waivers. Top Trump appointees arrested further funding and banned new projects for at least three months.

“We need to correct the impression that the waiver was self-executing by virtue of the announcement,” said Marcia Wong, the former deputy assistant administrator of USAID’s humanitarian assistance bureau.

Aid groups that had already received U.S. money were told they could not spend it or do any previously approved work. The contractors quoted in this article spoke on the condition of anonymity because they feared the administration might prolong their suspension or cancel their contracts completely.

As crucial days and hours pass, aid groups say Trump’s order has already caused irreparable harm. Often without cash reserves or endowments, many organizations depend on U.S. funding entirely and have been forced to lay off staff and cancel contracts with vendors. One CEO said he expects up to 3,000 aid workers to lose their jobs in Washington alone, according to the trade publication Devex. Some groups may have to shutter altogether because they can’t afford to float their overhead costs without knowing if or when they’d get reimbursed.

Critics say the past week has also undermined Trump’s own stated goals of American prosperity and security by opening a vacuum for international adversaries to fill, while putting millions at immediate and long-term risk.

“A chaotic, unexplained and abrupt pause with no guidance has left all our partners around the world high and dry and America looking like a severely unreliable actor to do business with,” a USAID official told ProPublica, adding that other countries will now have good reason to look to China or Russia for the help they’re no longer getting from the U.S. “There’s nothing that was left untouched.”

Preparation for the launch of the mpox vaccination campaign at the General Hospital of Goma, in the Democratic Republic of Congo, in October 2024. The federal aid standstill could affect mpox supplies for patients across Africa. (Aubin Mukoni/AFP/Getty Images)

In response to a detailed list of questions for this article, the White House referred ProPublica to the State Department. The State Department said to direct all questions about USAID to the agency itself. USAID did not reply to our emails. Much of its communications staff was let go in the last week.

In a public statement Wednesday, the State Department defended the foreign aid freezes and said the government has issued dozens of exemption waivers in recent days.

“The previously announced 90-day pause and review of U.S. foreign aid is already paying dividends to our country and our people,” the statement said. “We are rooting out waste. We are blocking woke programs. And we are exposing activities that run contrary to our national interests. None of this would be possible if these programs remained on autopilot.”

The dire international situation has been exacerbated by upheaval in Washington. This week, the Trump administration furloughed 500 support staff contractors from USAID’s humanitarian assistance bureau, about 40% of the unit, and fired 400 more from the global health bureau. Those workers were told to stop working and “please head home.”

The remaining officials in Washington are now attempting to navigate a confounding waiver process and get lifesaving programs back online. Officials and diplomats told ProPublica that Trump’s new political appointees have not consulted USAID’s longtime humanitarian experts when crafting the new policies. As a result, career civil servants said they are struggling to understand the policy or how to carry it out.

During an internal meeting early in the week, one of USAID’s top Middle East officials told mission directors that the bar for aid groups to qualify for an exemption to Trump’s freeze was high, according to meeting notes. It took until Thursday for the directors to receive instructions for how to fill out a spreadsheet with the programs they think should qualify for a waiver and why, a government employee told ProPublica. “The waiver for humanitarian assistance has been a farce,” another USAID official said.

“Like a Russian nesting doll of fuck-ups,” said Jeremy Konyndyk, who ran some of USAID’s largest programs under Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. “It’s just astonishing.”

Fear of retaliation is permeating the government’s foreign aid agencies, which have become some of Trump’s first targets in his campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. Earlier this week, the administration pulled down photographs of children and families from the agency’s hallways.

Many are afraid of being punished or fired for doing their jobs. Officials in USAID’s humanitarian affairs bureau say they have been prohibited from even accepting calendar invites from aid organizations or setting up out-of-office email replies.

On Monday, USAID placed about 60 senior civil servants on administrative leave, citing unspecified attempts to “circumvent” the president’s agenda. The group received an email informing them of the decision without an explanation before they were locked out of the agency’s systems and banned from the building.

“We’re civil servants,” one of the officials said. “I should have been given notice, due process. Instead there was an agencywide notice accusing people of subverting the president’s executive orders.”

Then, on Thursday, the agency’s labor relations director told the group that he was withdrawing the agency’s decision because he found no evidence of misconduct, according to emails obtained by ProPublica.

Hours later, the director was put on administrative leave himself. “The agency’s front office and DOGE instructed me to violate the due process of our employees by issuing immediate termination notices,” he wrote to colleagues, referring to Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency run by Elon Musk. (Musk did not respond to a request for comment.)

Later that night, the original 60 officials were placed back on leave again.

On Thursday, the U.S. Agency for International Development’s director of labor relations told about 60 senior civil servants placed on administrative leave by the Trump administration that he had reinstated them. (Obtained by ProPublica. Redacted by ProPublica.) Hours later, the labor relations director himself was put on leave. He said the agency’s front office and the Department of Government Efficiency had instructed him to fire his colleagues without due process. (Obtained by ProPublica. Redacted by ProPublica.)

Diplomats have long lauded American humanitarian efforts overseas because they help build crucial alliances around the world with relatively little cost.

When he created USAID in 1961, President John F. Kennedy called it a historic opportunity to improve the developing world so that countries don’t fall into economic collapse. That, he told Congress, “would be disastrous to our national security, harmful to our comparative prosperity and offensive to our conscience.”

USAID is responsible for the most successful international health program of the 21st century. The President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, created in 2003 by President George W. Bush to combat HIV globally, has saved an estimated 26 million lives over the past 22 years. It currently helps supply HIV medicines to 20 million people, and it funds HIV testing and jobs for thousands of health care workers, mainly in Africa.

That all ground to a halt this week. Since receiving the U.S. government’s stop-work orders, contractors who manage the program say they have so far received little communication about what work they will be allowed to continue, or when. They are not allowed to hand out medicines already bought and sitting on shelves.

If the exemption waivers don’t come through, policy analysts and HIV advocates say the full 90-day suspension of those programs would have disastrous consequences. More than 222,000 people pick up HIV treatment every day through the program, according to an analysis by amFAR, a nonprofit dedicated to AIDS research and advocacy. As of Friday morning, those orders had not been lifted, according to three people with direct knowledge.

Up through last week, PEPFAR was providing HIV treatment to an estimated 680,000 pregnant women, the majority of whom are in Africa. A 90-day stoppage could lead to an estimated 136,000 babies acquiring HIV, according to the amfAR analysis. Since HIV testing services are also suspended, many of those could go undiagnosed.

The disarray has also reached warzones and foreign governments, risking disease outbreaks and straining international relationships forged over decades.

Government officials worried about contract personnel who were suddenly stranded in remote locations. In Syria, camp managers were told to abandon their site at al-Hawl refugee camp, which is also a prison for ISIS sympathizers. That left the refugees inside with nowhere to turn for basic supplies like food and gas.

In Mogadishu, Somalia, the State Department instructed security guards who were protecting an arms depot from insurgents to simply walk off the site, according to a company official. When the guards asked what would happen to the armory, their government contacts told them they didn’t have any answers. (Concerns about the armory were first reported by The Wall Street Journal.)

The contractors in Syria and Somalia have since been allowed to return to their sites.

An executive at a health care nonprofit told ProPublica he has not been so lucky. His group is still under the stop-work order and can’t fund medical operations in Gaza, where there is a fragile ceasefire deal between Hamas and Israel that depends in part on the free flow of humanitarian aid.

“People will die,” the executive said. “For organizations that rely solely or largely on U.S. government funding, this hurts. That may be part of the message. But there would be less drastic ways to send it.”

In response to criticism, the Trump administration has offered misinformation. During a press conference, Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, touted the initiative’s success so far and said the government “found that there was about to be $50 million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza.” Trump later went further, saying Hamas fighters were using the condoms to make explosives.

They didn’t name the contractor, but the State Department later cited $100 million in canceled aid packages slated for the International Medical Corps.

IMC said in a response that no U.S. government funding was used for condoms or any other family-planning services. The organization has treated more than 33,000 Palestinians a month, according to the statement. It also operates one of the only centers in Gaza for severely malnourished children.

“If the stop-work order remains in place,” IMC said, “we will be unable to sustain these activities beyond the next week or so.”

There are also new outbreaks of Ebola in Uganda’s capital and of the disease’s cousin, the Marburg virus, in Tanzania. The U.S. has long been a key funder of biosecurity measures internationally, including at high-security labs. That funding is now on hold.

In Ukraine, groups that provide vital humanitarian aid for civilians and soldiers fighting Russia have been told to stand down without any meaningful updates in days, according to three officials familiar with the situation. The halted services include first responders, fuel for hospitals and evacuation routes for refugees fleeing the front lines.

“These are people who have been living in a war zone for three years this month,” the head of one of the organizations said, adding that they may have to lay off 20% of its staff. “And we are taking away these very basic services that they need to survive.”

Concrete electrical poles provided by USAID replace some that were damaged by fighting in Ukraine as Russia targets electrical infrastructure across the country. (Scott Peterson/Getty Images)

A support staffer working on contract for the U.S. mission in Yemen said her entire team had been told to stop their work last weekend, which ProPublica corroborated with contemporaneous emails. “One of my tasks was summarizing how many people had been directly saved by our health programs every week,” she said. “It was usually 80 to 100.”

Their stop-work order has not been lifted. It will be a week on Sunday.

Do You Work for the Federal Government? ProPublica Wants to Hear From You.