Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet - Gripen seems obvious

Canada weighs F-35 and Gripen fleet, seeks industrial return Canada delays F-35 decision as Ottawa weighs Gripen option and industrial retur...

Federal Liberals surging in B.C. in ways not seen since Trudeau-mania: poll - Greater Victoria News

Federal Liberals surging in B.C. in ways not seen since Trudeau-mania: poll - Greater Victoria News
Once dominated by the federal New Democrats, the southern tip of Vancouver Island could see spots of federal Liberal red, while its northern parts could turn federal Conservative blue
250407-bpd-carney-richmond-rally5
Liberal Party of Canada Leader Mark Carney speaks to a packed ballroom at the Sheraton Vancouver Airport Hotel in Richmond on Monday, April 7. It was his second day in B.C., and second rally in the province.

Federal Liberal Leader Mark Carney may have left B.C. after a two-day swing, including a stop in Richmond Monday night, but a poll released Tuesday points to solidifying strength in Canada's most western province not seen since the Trudeau-mania of the late 1960s.

The Research Co. poll shows the federal Liberals (44 per cent) leading the federal Conservatives under Pierre Poilievre by six points in B.C. Nationally, the federal Liberals are leading the Conservatives 44 per cent to 36 per cent.

"We have to go back to 1968 to have a level of support for the Liberals similar to what they have right now," Mario Canseco, president of Research Co., said. "In the first Trudeau-mania election, they got 42 per cent of the vote in B.C. They are at 44 per cent, so it's historic."

Canseco added that the current support for the federal Liberals puts them ahead of their 2015 showing when they won 35 per cent of the popular vote and picked up seats in areas that had not voted for the federal Liberals in decades, such as Kelowna. 

"(The) explanation is essentially the collapse of the NDP vote across the country and that includes British Columbia," Canseco said. "They are in the single digits everywhere." 

Nationally, the federal New Democrats are polling at eight per cent, equal to their level of support in British Columbia. That means that New Democrats are on pace to win less than half of their popular vote (17 per cent) in 2021. 

Canseco said some New Democratic voters are going to the Conservatives. "But many of them are going to the Liberals and it raises the question about the viability of some long-term incumbents," he said. 

New Democrats held 24 seats at dissolution, with 12 of those in British Columbia, including five seats on Vancouver Island. A sixth New Democrat MP -- Randall Garrison -- retired before dissolution. Four incumbents (Lisa Marie Barron, Laurel Collins, Gord Johns and Alistair MacGregor) are running again in their Vancouver Island ridings, while Rachel Blaney won't be running in North Island-Powell River. 

Carney Sunday campaigned in Collins' riding of Victoria, then made an environmental announcement in Saanich-Gulf Islands, the riding of long-time federal Green MP Elizabeth.

Historically, federal Liberals have done well in Metro Vancouver with federal Conservatives and federal New Democrats competing against each other in parts of the province, including Vancouver Island. 

Canseco said Carney is fishing in NDP and Green waters because the Liberals sense an opportunity to have a massive majority government based on their large and growing leads in Ontario and Quebec. 

"It would be rare to see pockets of (federal Liberal red) on (Vancouver Island), but if you start to see this trend of the vote for the NDP dropping and the vote for the Liberals rising, you could see some red," he said. "But it also raises the question of an interesting strategic voting decision, particularly in the north (of Vancouver Island)."

If New Democratic support in the northern half of Vancouver Island drops with the federal Liberals gaining, federal Conservatives, including controversial candidate Aaron Gunn, could end up as winners, he said. 

In other words, surging Liberals could actually benefit federal Conservatives on northern Vancouver Island by taking away support for New Democrats. "I think that is a real possibility in the north," Canseco said. 

Conservatives, for their part, have identified Vancouver Island, along with parts of B.C.'s interior for pick-ups and incumbent federal New Democrats on northern Vancouver Island, in other words, appear in trouble, according to available polls. Their incumbency, in other words, might make no difference, just as it did not make any difference for the former B.C. United MLAs who ran as independents during last year's provincial election. 

"I think that's a good analogy," he said. He added that in Ontario, New Democrats finished with more seats than the provincial Liberals, even though they won fewer votes, because of their local connections. "But this one (election) is different, because it is ultimately a referendum on Trump," he said. 

This point shines through when looking at the issues most important to voters. According to the survey, three-in-ten likely voters (31 per cent, up one per cent) think Canada-U.S. relations to be the most important issue facing the country. Far fewer choose the economy and jobs (19 per cent, minus one per cent), housing, homelessness and poverty (18 per cent, up one per cent), health care (11 per cent, up two) and immigration (five per cent, minus two per cent).

Canseco said these figures play to Carney's strengths, especially among Canadians 55 years and older. Among that age cohort, 40 per cent consider U.S.-Canada relations the most important issue. The issue becomes less important for younger voters, with whom Conservatives are still connecting, Canseco said. 

"But you can't win with that group," he said. "You need to be able to bridge the gap with (voters 55 years and older)," Canseco said. He added that Conservatives tried to do that to a degree with his promise to increase the annual limit on contributions to the tax-free savings account, but only for funds invested in Canadian companies.

"But this group (55 years and older) is completely galvanized by the Trump thing, Canada-U.S. relations and the effect it will have on the economy and jobs," Canseco said. He added that Poilievre needs to discuss what the country would look like if he were Trump's rival. "That is also part of what changed things," he said. "It was fairly easy for Poilievre to go out there and say, 'Justin Trudeau is not respect. This is why we are being called the 51st state." 

But Trump's tone toward Canada has changed since Carney has become prime minister by replacing Trudeau as federal Liberal leader. "He (Poilievre) can't say, 'well, Carney is not respected.'" 

Notwithstanding on Guard for Thee

 

Notwithstanding on Guard for Thee

The Prime Minister will use a never-before invoked power to overrule the Supreme Court and strip Canadians of a constitutional right. Sounds pretty scary, if you say it like that. But is that what Pierre Poilievre is actually promising to do? I’m Jacob Boon and welcome back to The Run.

The Conservative Leader has promised to bring back legislation to impose consecutive life sentences — not concurrent — for those who commit multiple murders.

It was an idea that Poilievre’s mentor, Stephen Harper, introduced when prime minister, only for it to be shot down by the Supreme Court of Canada in 2022.

The ruling of R. v. Bissonnette found that life in prison without the possibility of parole for extended periods violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms’ protection against cruel and unusual punishments.

But in a candid and upfront campaign promise, Poilievre says he’ll bypass the courts if elected by invoking the notwithstanding clause. If so, he’ll become the first Canadian prime minister to use the controversial get-out-of-the-Charter-free card that allows governments to override court rulings for a five-year period.

Over on his Substack, political scientist Jared Wesley says this bold manoeuvre raises two serious questions for Canadians: 1. Is consecutive life sentences for multiple murders a justified goal for our society? 2. Is achieving that goal worth overriding a Charter right?

“As citizens, we can (and should) argue over the moral weight of life sentences, the role of rehabilitation, and the meaning of dignity. We can (and should) discuss whether Parliament should be allowed to override rights in this instance. That’s our duty when we are called upon to do so.”

Poilievre’s supporters will say this is what the clause was designed to do. Critics will say this is a slippery slope for eroding the Charter. But whatever you believe, Wesley argues, Poilievre isn’t hiding what he’s going to do. He’s asking Canadians to choose.

“This is not authoritarianism. It’s constitutional democracy,” says Wesley. “Poilievre is not attempting to suppress debate. He’s igniting it.”

Parents Sue Trump Administration for Allegedly Sabotaging Education Department’s Civil Rights Division

Parents Sue Trump Administration for Allegedly Sabotaging Education Department’s Civil Rights Division

ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up to receive our biggest stories as soon as they’re published.

Saying the Trump administration is sabotaging civil rights enforcement by the Department of Education, a federal lawsuit filed Friday morning seeks to stop the president and Secretary Linda McMahon from carrying out the mass firing of civil rights investigators and lawyers.

Two parents and the Council of Parent Attorneys and Advocates, a national disability rights group, jointly filed the lawsuit. It alleges that decimating the department’s Office for Civil Rights will leave the agency unable to handle the public’s complaints of discrimination at school. That, they said, would violate the equal protection clause of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

The complaint comes three days after the Education Department notified about 1,300 employees — including the entire staff in seven of the 12 regional civil rights offices — that they are being fired, and the day after a group of 21 Democratic attorneys general sued McMahon and the president. That lawsuit alleges the Trump administration does not have the authority to circumvent Congress to effectively shutter the department.

The complaint filed on Friday argues that the “OCR has abdicated its responsibility to enforce civil rights protections” and that the administration has made a “decision to sabotage” the Education Department’s civil rights functions. That, the lawsuit alleges, overrides Congress’ authority. It names the Education Department, McMahon and the acting head of OCR, Craig Trainor.

“Through a series of press releases, policy statements, and executive orders, the administration has made clear its contempt for the civil rights of marginalized students,” the lawsuit says.

The parents’ lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. It asks the court to declare the “decimation” of the OCR unlawful and seeks an injunction to compel the office to “process OCR complaints promptly and equitably.”

A Department of Education spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. But the department has said it would still meet its legal obligations.

The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general was filed in federal court in Massachusetts. It alleges the firings are “so severe and extreme that it incapacitates components of the Department responsible for performing functions mandated by statute.” It cites the closing of the seven regional OCR outposts as an example.

Each year, the OCR investigates thousands of allegations of discrimination in schools based on disability, race and gender and is one of the federal government’s largest civil rights units. At last count there were about 550 OCR employees; at least 243 union-represented employees were laid off Tuesday.

The administration plans to close OCR locations in Boston, Chicago, Cleveland, Dallas, New York, Philadelphia and San Francisco. Offices will remain in Atlanta, Denver, Kansas City, Seattle and Washington, D.C.

The lawsuit brought by the parents and advocacy group reveals concerns by students and families who have pending complaints that, under President Donald Trump, are not being investigated. There also are concerns that new complaints won’t get investigated if they don’t fall under one of the president’s priorities: curbing antisemitism, ending participation of transgender athletes in women’s sports and combating alleged discrimination against white students.

After Trump was inaugurated on Jan. 20, the administration implemented a monthlong freeze on the agency’s civil rights work. Although OCR investigators were prohibited from working on their assigned discrimination cases, the Trump administration launched a new “End DEI Portal” meant only to collect complaints about diversity, equity and inclusion in schools. It has said it is trying to shrink the size of government, including the Education Department, which Trump has called a “big con job.”

Trump’s actions so far have led many to wonder “if there is a real and meaningful complaint investigation process existing at the moment,” said Johnathan Smith, an attorney at the National Center for Youth Law, which represents the plaintiffs. Smith is a former deputy assistant attorney general in the U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division.

“They are putting the thumb on the scale of who the winners and losers are before they do the investigation, and that is deeply problematic from a law enforcement perspective,” Smith said.

The lawsuit is perhaps the most substantive legal effort to require the Education Department to enforce civil rights since 1970, when the NAACP sued the agency for allowing segregation to continue. That lawsuit resulted in repeated overhauling of the OCR and 20 years of judicial oversight, with the goal of ensuring that the division fairly investigated and enforced discrimination claims.

Students and families turn to the OCR after they feel their concerns have not been addressed by their schools or colleges. Both individuals named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit are parents of students whose civil rights complaints were being investigated — until Trump took office.

One of the plaintiffs, Alabama parent Nikki S. Carter, has three students and is an advocate for students with disabilities in her community. Carter is Black. According to the lawsuit, Carter filed a complaint with OCR in 2022 alleging discrimination on the basis of race after her children’s school district, the Demopolis City Schools, twice banned Carter from school district property.

When reached by ProPublica, the district superintendent said he’s not aware of the lawsuit or the civil rights complaint and could not comment; he is new to the district.

The district has said it barred Carter after a confrontation with a white staff member. But Carter has said that a white parent who had a similar confrontation wasn’t banned, leading her to believe that the district punished her because of her advocacy. She said it prevented her from attending parent-teacher conferences and other school events.

The other parent, identified by the initials A.W., filed a complaint with OCR alleging their child’s school failed to respond properly to sexual assault and harassment by a classmate.

Investigations of both families’ discrimination complaints have stopped under the new OCR leadership, according to the lawsuit.

The IRS is barely auditing anymore

 

IRS building

Tom Williams/Getty Images

The government’s gimme-money department has shrunk so much that it’s struggling to get up and work. IRS audits are at a record low and could plunge even further following President Trump’s cuts, the New York Times reported yesterday.

According to NYT’s analysis of federal data:

  • Audit rates for personal income taxes fell from ~1% (about 1 in every 100 tax returns) in 2010 to just 0.36% in 2023 (roughly 1 in 300).
  • The audit rate fell below 0.5% in 2020 for the first time on record.
  • The IRS has collected only $4.5 billion from 2019 personal audits so far, down from $11 billion from audits of 2010 returns—and there have been “steep declines” in corporate audits, too.

Why? The IRS cut more than 20% of its 95,000-person workforce between 2010 and 2019, leaving burdened workers with less room for time-consuming high-income audits, which can recoup $100,000+ from a single flawed tax return.

Auditing could get worse: DOGE is planning on cutting 18,000+ IRS workers, which would cost the government $6.8 billion in lost tax revenue next year, according to Yale’s nonpartisan Budget Lab. As many as 5,000 IRS employees have already accepted buyouts.

Also…the White House announced yesterday that the IRS will start sharing undocumented taxpayers’ information with ICE, which reportedly could violate federal privacy laws. DOGE is also seeking to widen access to taxpayer info, Wired reported this weekend.—ML

Chevron Ordered to Pay $744.6 Million for Destroying Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands

Chevron Ordered to Pay $744.6 Million for Destroying Louisiana’s Coastal Wetlands

Oil giant Chevron has been ordered by a Louisiana civil court jury to pay $744.6 million to a parish government to help restore coastal wetlands destroyed by the company over a period of decades.

The lawsuit was the first of 42 filed against the company since 2013, reported The Guardian.

The jury found that energy major Texaco — bought by Chevron in 2001 — had been violating state coastal resources regulations by not restoring wetlands that were impacted by drilling oil wells, dredging canals and the billions of gallons of toxic wastewater dumped into the environment, The Associated Press reported.

“No company is big enough to ignore the law, no company is big enough to walk away scot-free,” lead attorney for the plaintiffs John Carmouche told the jury during closing arguments, as reported by The Associated Press.

The prominent Albertans behind delinquent oil and gas companies | The Narwhal

The prominent Albertans behind delinquent oil and gas companies | The Narwhal

Don Taylor is a well-known figure in the world of business and philanthropy in Alberta. His family name adorns university libraries and performing arts centres, not to mention the newly built polar bear enclosure at the Calgary Zoo.  

He’s an officer of the Order of Canada and a laureate of the Alberta Business Hall of Fame, largely for his work building a company called Engineered Air into one of North America’s largest manufacturers of heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems. Taylor is also known for his decades-long push to nearly double the size of Canmore through the Three Sisters Mountain Village development, which he co-owns. 

What Taylor is not known for is being one of the owners of oil and gas operators that have failed to pay their bills when it comes to required oil and gas cleanup fees. According to the Alberta Energy Regulator, one of two delinquent companies he co-owns also owes over $180,000 in unpaid municipal taxes.

Part of the reason that’s not well known is simple —  the information is not easy to come by. 

For the past two years, the Alberta Energy Regulator has issued an annual liability management report, highlighting its progress on tackling Alberta’s multi-billion-dollar oil and gas cleanup problem. Part of that reporting includes publishing the names of companies that have failed to make specific payments related to cleaning up old wells — minimum spending on closing old wells, or mandatory levies paid to the Orphan Well Association which cleans up sites with no viable owner. 

But that list means little to most Albertans, and it certainly doesn’t shed light on the people behind these companies.

The Narwhal spent weeks collecting and organizing corporate registry documents for the companies named by the regulator and built a detailed database of the voting shareholders, directors and any associated companies. 

The end result is a peek into the complex web of ownership in Alberta’s oilpatch, and sheds light on some of the prominent people — including Taylor, former prime minister Stephen Harper and other well-connected businesspeople — behind companies the regulator says haven’t met their obligations. 

Some of the ultimate decision-makers and beneficiaries of the companies listed by the regulator have significant power and wealth — wealth that likely exceeds any amount owing for the right to extract the province’s natural resources. 

The Narwhal has focused on highlighting some of the more prominent names attached to a small handful of companies. Despite the millions owed, the listed companies still represent only a small portion of the multi-billion-dollar cleanup costs in the province. And while transparency is a crucial first step, some critics say the regulator needs to do more to address the larger cleanup issue.

David Cooper, a professor emeritus in accounting who studied regulatory systems at the University of Alberta, says transparency is critical in regulatory work and Alberta needs to catch up. 

“In many jurisdictions, there are many more restrictions on making your company anonymous or making ownership anonymous,” he said. “Alberta is an outlier in regard to the secrecy of corporate behavior and ownership in Canada, let alone the rest of the world.”

Companies with ties to the Taylor family owe millions in unpaid fees

Looking at the regulator’s list of delinquent companies, there would be no way to tell that some companies are intricately linked. 

Primrose Drilling Ventures and Crimson Oil and Gas are both controlled by Altima Resources, for example, and all three show up on the regulator’s list — Primrose only for 2023. 

A similar situation revealed itself in the case of Topanga Resources and Pismo Energy, both of which required digging into several layers of ownership documents before determining who owned and benefitted from them. 

A diagram showing the ownership structure of North Shore Petroleum, which controls two other energy companies cited by the Alberta Energy Regulator for failure to pay fees and levies.
North Shore Petroleum is a complex web of ownership, with the Taylor family at its core. The family, well known in the world of business and philanthropy in Alberta, is the largest shareholder. Illustration: Drew Anderson

The sole voting shareholder of both companies is North Shore Petroleum, whose largest single shareholder is Resman Holdings Inc at 43 per cent. That company is controlled by the Taylor family.

Resman Holdings’ sole voting shareholder is the family trust, under the names of Don Taylor and his son, David. 

Collectively, Topanga and Pismo have estimated liabilities of $14.3 million and have failed to meet the regulator’s minimum cleanup spending requirements, and to pay the required orphan fund levy, in both 2022 and 2023. 

It owes just over $900,000 in overdue liability spending quota payments. 

Pismo was put into receivership in December last year, and has a list of orders, sanctions and warnings on the regulator’s compliance dashboard, including failure to report and clean up spills. In a September 2024 order, the regulator said the company owed more than $180,000 in unpaid municipal taxes. 

Over half of Pismo’s wells are inactive, according to the regulator — over 80 per cent of which are not compliant with regulations and 22 per cent of which have been inactive for more than 10 years. Inactive wells have not been properly sealed and the ground around them has not been reclaimed. They could theoretically be brought back into production, but can languish idle on the landscape for years.

The company has been ordered to suspend and permanently seal its wells. 

Topanga faces a similar list of infractions and orders from the regulator, including one that calls for it to seal its wells, which Topanga attempted to block by arguing it was attempting to sell its assets. 

In February, the regulator transferred some of the company’s wells to the Orphan Well Association.

Don Taylor did not respond to multiple requests for comment. John Zang, the director of both companies listed as the contact person in corporate documents did not respond to an interview request or written questions and it’s unclear whether he forwarded a second email to Don Taylor as requested. 

A follow-up email was sent to Don Taylor through the lawyer listed in receiver documents for Resman Holdings Inc., but there has been no response. Don Taylor also did not respond to a letter dropped off by hand in the mailbox of his Calgary home.

An email was also sent to David Taylor at the email address listed on the Resman Holdings website, but there was no reply. There was also no reply to a voice message left at the number listed for David Taylor on that same site. Registered mail sent to the home David Taylor did not receive a reply. 

Database reveals some big names, including former prime minister Stephen Harper 

Some of the companies listed by the regulator wouldn’t draw much attention for their failure to pay aside from the names attached to them. 

Recover Inc., for instance, is a company that takes oilfield waste, cleans it and then recycles the leftovers for other uses. It was listed as delinquent for not paying its share of the Orphan Fund Levy in 2022, but has since paid its bills and was dropped from the list in 2023. 

However, documents show Stephen Harper, the former prime minister of Canada, sits on the company’s board and is also a working equity partner in Azimuth Capital, which is the majority voting shareholder in Recover Inc.

Harper did not return a request for an interview or respond to emailed questions. Courtney Burton, a lawyer for Recover Inc. replied to say the company’s non-compliance was “an administrative oversight which, once discovered, was immediately corrected.”

Harper was recently appointed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith as the chair of the Alberta Investment Management Corporation. The crown corporation oversees approximately $170 billion in public investments, including public pensions. 

Burton did not respond when asked if the company could clarify the nature of that oversight or when it was resolved. 

Not all of the outstanding fees are as small. 

Numerous well-known business people and developers also tied to delinquent companies

Don Taylor isn’t the only big developer whose name is tied to delinquent companies. 

New North Resources Ltd. has failed to pay its mandated minimum on well cleanup in both 2022 and 2023. In light of those infractions, the regulator has concluded the company poses an “unreasonable risk” and says it will prevent New North from acquiring new licences until it is compliant. 

The company is largely owned by developers and prominent businesspeople in Alberta, including Jay Westman, the chairman and CEO of Jayman Built, one of Calgary’s largest home builders.

He is a voting shareholder in New North alongside other developers, either listed personally or through companies which they control. 

Among them is Harvey Thal, chairman of Royop, and his son Jeremy Thal, its current CEO, who controls a numbered company that is a voting shareholder in New North. 

Royop is a major strip mall developer and the numbered company tied to Jeremy Thal — 747384 Alberta Ltd. — is a shareholder in dozens of companies linked to those properties.  

Another voting shareholder is Marc Staniloff, the president and CEO of Superior Lodging, a major hotel franchiser that boasts 215 branded hotels in Canada.

A suburban street in a new development in southeast Calgary
Some big developers in Calgary are owners in one company that has not paid the minimum amount required for well cleanups in Alberta. The owners include homebuilders, strip mall developers and liquor store founders. Photo: Drew Anderson / The Narwhal

Staniloff and Harvey Thal both also sit on New North’s board alongside brothers Terry and Donald Richardson, the founders of Crowfoot Wine and Spirits — a chain with seven locations in Calgary.

New North has 198 licences, according to the regulator, and estimated liabilities of $17.1 million. Of those licences, 71 are for inactive wells, and a further 58 are for marginal wells which have low production. 

It has also been cited in the past for failing to conduct a required feasibility study prior to drilling horizontal wells, for using sub-par materials on pipelines and for not undertaking adequate testing. The latter resulted in a suspension of operations for that section of pipeline in 2021.

The company owes just over $540,000 for its outstanding closure spend quota. 

In the most recent order from the regulator on March 12, the company is required to submit over $1 million in security to help cover portions of its liabilities. The order includes a seven-page list of regulatory infractions that need to be rectified and says the company has a history of failed field inspections.

There was no reply to multiple emails sent to New North, asking to speak with the individuals highlighted in this story.

Individual emails were also sent to the private and/or company email addresses of Staniloff, Westman, Harvey Thal and Jeremy Thal. There were no replies. 

Registered mail was also sent to the home addresses of Terry and Donald Richardson. Tracking shows both letters were delivered to community mailboxes on March 12. There was no reply. 

A delinquent company shares rationale

Only one person contacted by The Narwhal agreed to an interview regarding their ownership of a delinquent oil and gas company. 

Robyn Lore, who gained some notoriety when he was fined by Alberta’s electoral commissioner for funnelling illegal money into the United Conservative Party leadership campaign of Jeff Callaway in Alberta, is a one-third owner of Richards Oil & Gas through his company Agropyron Enterprises.

That company, which has 27 licences and estimated liabilities of $1.4 million, didn’t pay its minimum cleanup amounts in either 2022 or 2023. 

Lore says he and his partners bought the gas wells about 15 years ago from a company that was bankrupt.

“We’ve kept those under production and never made much money at it,” Lore said in an interview with The Narwhal, admitting the company has not paid the minimum cleanup amount. 

A sign for Alberta's Orphan Well Association on a gate leading to a well site with where the company has walked away
When a company can’t afford to clean up the wells it leaves behind, the Orphan Well Association steps in to do so. The association is funded by industry through a mandatory levy imposed each year. Some companies, however, have not been contributing the way they are supposed to. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

“A couple of years ago — 2022 I think — the rules changed and there was a required abandonment spend, and that you also have to document that,” Lore said, referring to the industry term (abandoning) for permanently sealing a well. “And we haven’t made those payments.”

The total amount owing for the company is just over $82,000.

Asked why Richards hasn’t paid up, Lore simply says it doesn’t have the money.

Lore said the company is in the process of selling the wells to another company, which he says will have the resources to meet regulatory requirements and levies and notes it is increasingly difficult for small operators to exist in Alberta’s patch. 

“These sorts of regulations cause the oil business to only have big companies that have ongoing well-abandonment programs just as a matter of their business course,” he said. 

‘Will be too late’: law professor concerned system is set up to fail

University of Calgary law professor Martin Olszynski, who studies oil and gas liabilities, has a similar concern about large companies, albeit for different reasons.

He argues publishing the list of companies that haven’t paid their orphan levy and/or liability spending quota, appears transparent — but works to obscure the real problem. 

Olszynski worries the biggest offenders, in terms of inactive assets, aren’t even on the list, but that’s because they know enough to stay on the right side of what he sees as weak laws. He notes that Canadian Natural Resources has approximately 20,000 inactive wells — almost a quarter of all such wells in Alberta. 

“They pay their portion of an entirely inadequate orphan well levy, and they pay their required closure spend, but it makes virtually no difference in their liabilities,” he said. “And it won’t, until they too face financial distress, at which point the system will trigger a cash call, which of course will be too late.”

Aerial view over a sprawling patch of oilsands development
High-end estimates of how much it would cost to clean up after oil and gas extraction in Alberta — including the oilsands — are more than $100 billion. The companies highlighted by the regulator for failure to pay their orphan fund levies or meet minimum cleanup spending are a small fraction of the larger issue. One law professor says the list obscures a big problem. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

Canadian Natural Resources did not respond to The Narwhal request for comment.

The Alberta Energy Regulator’s own stats on liability and orphan levy spending highlight the relatively small number of companies that show up on its delinquent list. It notes 91 per cent of licencees were compliant with closure spending quotas in 2023 and the delinquent companies represent less than one per cent of the required industry spending.

In total, the regulator estimates oil and gas liabilities amount to $36 billion, but critics like Olszynski have questioned the veracity of that figure and say it could be significantly higher. That number also excludes the oilsands, where liabilities exceed $50 billion, according to the regulator. 

But the companies listed by the regulator for not paying their dues also represent hundreds of wells, pipelines and facilities spread across the province. It adds up to a patchwork of infrastructure that has a direct impact on landowners and the general public.

Alberta Energy Regulator says it uses discretion when issuing new licences to delinquent companies

The regulator has the ability to sanction individuals for the actions of the companies they own or direct, but Cooper from the University of Alberta says that never happens. 

Those associated with problem companies could be prevented from acquiring new licences, even under a different corporate name, and companies associated with a problem company could face similar repercussions. 

The regulator says in cases of failure to pay levies or meet mandatory cleanup costs, regulatory action is taken against the licencee and not individuals, but there can be consequences for individuals in some circumstances and corporate ownership and structure can factor into its determination of financial risk when evaluating companies.  

Coral Hulse, a spokesperson for the regulator, said the regulator can use its discretion on whether or not to name individuals associated with a company for regulatory infractions and that it has done so. Instead of providing examples, it directed The Narwhal to its compliance dashboard, but there is no way to search that public directory for that specific sanction.

An oil derricks in an Alberta field, with the land cleared around it.
There are approximately 75,000 inactive oil and gas wells in Alberta. Those wells can sometimes languish on the landscape for decades and contaminate the surrounding land. Alberta has tried to tackle the issue more seriously, but has failed to make significant inroads into the backlog. Photo: Amber Bracken / The Narwhal

When asked for guidance, Hulse said the dashboard “requires a manual search of individual names.”

Despite the long list of regulatory infractions, no individual’s names are associated with New North in the latest order from the regulator.

Hulse said the regulator will use its discretion about whether to consider individuals associated with a company. Those considerations could include connections to other companies or regulatory infractions.

In an earlier response to questions, Renato Gandia, another spokesperson for the regulator, said it collects financial and reserve information from licencees, but those records are kept confidential for five years in the case of financials and 15 years in the case of reserves. 

“The information submitted by a licencee to the [Alberta Energy Regulator] will remain confidential; however, some of the findings or results generated from [Alberta Energy Regulator] assessments using the financial and reserve information will be made available through liability management reporting and compliance and enforcement responses,” he wrote.

Even with the level of digging undertaken by The Narwhal, we still haven’t been able to get to the bottom of each and every company, shell company, holding company and partnership. 

If you have tips on who’s behind oil and gas companies in Canada that aren’t paying their bills, please contact Prairies reporter Drew Anderson over email at drew@thenarwhal.ca or securely over Signal at @Danderson.78.

Another year of keeping a close watch
Here at The Narwhal, we don’t use profit, awards or pageviews to measure success. The thing that matters most is real-world impact — evidence that our reporting influenced citizens to hold power to account and pushed policymakers to do better.

And in 2024, our stories were raised in parliaments across the country and cited by citizens in their petitions and letters to politicians.

In Alberta, our reporting revealed Premier Danielle Smith made false statements about the controversial renewables pause. In Manitoba, we proved that officials failed to formally inspect a leaky pipeline for years. And our investigations on a leaked recording of TC Energy executives were called “the most important Canadian political story of the year.”

We’d like to thank you for paying attention. And if you’re able to donate anything at all to help us keep doing this work in 2025 — which will bring a whole lot we can’t predict — thank you so very much.

Will you help us hold the powerful accountable in the year to come by giving what you can today?

Drew Anderson
Drew Anderson is the Prairies reporter for The Narwhal, based in Calgary. He previously worked for CBC and was the editor and publisher of the now-def...