Sign up today

Sign up today
Softphone APP for Android &IOS

RG Richardson Communications News

I am a business economist with interests in international trade worldwide through politics, money, banking and VOIP Communications. The author of RG Richardson City Guides has over 300 guides, including restaurants and finance.

eComTechnology Posts

Our House Was a Very, Very, Very Fine House

Our House Was a Very, Very, Very Fine House Trump views the physical history of the White House much as he views the nation’s laws: somethi...

Exclusive: Trump-friendly Teamsters could still object to Paramount merger

 

Exclusive: Trump-friendly Teamsters could still object to Paramount merger

Ellison's Skydance faces another challenge in getting Paramount merger approved

Exclusive reporting provided to MeidasTouch by Josh Kosman of JoshOnBusiness (JOBs). Subscribe to him on Substack here.

Amazon workers picket outside the gates of an Amazon fulfillment center during a strike as Teamsters seek a nationwide labor contract Friday, Dec. 20, 2024, in City of Industry, California. Ringo Chiu / Shutterstock.com

The Trump-influential Teamsters want to protect jobs at CBS parent Paramount which has become the next hurdle in the Ellisons controversial bid to buy the company, JOBs has learned.

Paramount earlier this month reached a $16 million settlement with President Trump over his suit alleging voter interference after CBS edited a 60 Minutes interview with Democratic Presidential Candidate Kamala Harris.The Teamsters want the Federal Communications Commission to place conditions on Skydance Media’s controversial $8 billion purchase of Paramount. Larry Ellison, worth $280 billion, backs Skydance which his son David runs.

Skydance has allegedly not met withTeamsters President Sean O’Brien.

Interestingly, the Teamsters and the right-leaning Center for American Rights have partnered on the effort calling on FCC Chair Brendan Carr to save jobs at Paramount’s 15 CBS-owned stations.

If Carr does not, there is a real threat that at least one of these organizations will publicly oppose the merger making the Skydance-Paramount tie-up look even more illegitimate, JOBs has learned.

The two organizations without worker protections may also push the FCC to consider alternative bids for Paramount like one being floated by Edgar Bronfman Jr. and Project Rise that would pay more to common Paramount shareholders, sources said.

“I’d be interested in seeing what their bid looks like,” Daniel Suhr of the Center for American Rights told JOBs. “We are actively engaged with a wide variety of stakeholders.”

Lawyer David Goodfriend on behalf of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and its Hollywood Local 399, and Suhr met on July 7 with FCC Deputy Division Chief David Brown and FCC Attorney Chris Robbins, according to an FCC public document.

“As part of its process, the FCC owes stakeholders and the American public a robust review of this transaction. Rubberstamping the transaction as-is does not serve the public interest,” Suhr, whose non-profit litigated cases to stop nationwide public health mandates and expand school choice, said in the filing.

Teamsters President Sean O’Brien spoke at the 2024 Republican National Convention and is known to have real influence with Trump.

Suhr believes that the FCC should consider all Paramount alternatives and not just Skydance.

The FCC staff is far along in writing its order approving the merger which may or may not be contingent on Skydance accepting certain workforce conditions, a source close to the situation said.

It’s ‘up in the air’ whether the FCC will include workplace protections, Suhr told JOBs. “I am optimistic we will see some progress.”

“I think we are in 8th and not the 9th inning of the approval process,” Suhr said, partly because the US Senate only confirmed new FCC Commissioner Olivia Trusty June 18 and she needs a little time to review all the material on the Skydance merger.

The Teamsters and the Center for American Rights have told the FCC what conditions they would like to see placed on the merger, public filings showed.

A cell phone sitting on top of a wooden table
CBS owns 15 local stations.

On May 5, the Teamsters said in a letter to the FCC it wanted Paramount to maintain staffing levels as they were on July 7, 2024, when the merger was signed, at its stations --- for eight years --- and not with the use of contractors, temporary workers, or reassignment of duties to part-time or freelance workers

The union also called for Paramount to file annual certifications with the FCC demonstrating compliance, including a headcount of full-time employees and a description of any staffing changes with certification signed by a senior officer under penalty of perjury, the filing said.

Film studio Skydance told analysts last July it planned $2 billion in cuts at Paramount as it developed a creative-tech hybrid media company, one much more focused on artificial intelligence.

Shari Redstone’s Paramount is already in cost-cutting mode.

Paramount last month said it was going to reduce its workforce by 3.5% after a bigger round of layoffs in August which resulted in almost 15% layoffs, or about 2,000 of its 18,600 global workers.

FCC Chair Carr may want to show that this is a legitimate merger review.

The Teamsters and Suhr, for somewhat different reasons, want Paramount to preserve jobs at its CBS television stations that includes KCBS in Los Angeles and New York’s WCBS.

While the Teamsters want to keep union jobs, Suhr said station newscasts should remain locally run so they reflect the views of their communities especially on CBS owned stations in Dallas, Denver and Pittsburgh where the general population is more conservative than those found in Paramount’s Los Angeles or New York-based headquarters. The concern is an Ellison-run Skydance will streamline local newscasts which will then lose their local flavor, Suhr said.

“We’ve suggested treating the CBS owned stations more like bureaus,” Suhr said. “How great would it be to have the best local reporting.”

IMPORTANT MESSAGE from MeidasTouch Founder

IMPORTANT MESSAGE from MeidasTouch Founder

·
11:02 AM
Read full story

Suhr told JOBs that Ellison and Skydance have refused to meet with his organization or the Teamsters to speak about their concerns.

“They haven’t taken up our invitation,” Suhr said. “It’s their loss.”

“They would rather negotiate with Chairman Carr than me.”

This merger has an air of illegitimacy, perhaps making Carr more interested in showing that he is giving it a serious review, sources said.

Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) after the July 2 Trump settlement in the 60 Minutes case called for a Congressional inquiry believing it could be construed as bribery “in plain sight” since the suit was “meritless” and Paramount likely needed to please the President to get its merger at the independent FCC approved.

There is some recent precedence.

Chairman Carr on July 10 approved a T-Mobile agreement in which the telecom company said it would crack down on vendors that hire undocumented workers or independent contractors.

Paramount, Teamsters and FCC spokespeople declined comment.

Subscribe to Josh Kosman’s Substack JoshOnBusiness here.

Meidas+ is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Leave a comment

Share


CBS becomes a quisling of journalism

 Welcome to Stop the Presses, a weekly newsletter about how right-wing extremism has exploited the weaknesses in American journalism and what we can do about it.


CBS becomes a quisling of journalism

The network folds to Trump, joining other outlets betraying the free press.

CBS News has become a quisling of journalism, a collaborator with Donald Trump’s assault on the free press.

The word “quisling” comes from Vidkun Quisling, a traitorous politician who led Norway’s puppet government during the Nazi occupation. At the end of World War II, he was executed by a firing squad.

CBS’ owners, on the other hand, are likely to walk away with a nice payday by knifing the U.S. Constitution’s 1st Amendment.

In a newly announced deal, CBS’ parent company, Paramount, agreed to pay $16 million to Trump’s future presidential library to settle his lawsuit against the media conglomerate.

The suit was a blatant act of extortion and abuse of power. Trump sued over CBS’s editing of an interview of Kamala Harris on “60 Minutes,” arguing that it represented “election and voter interference” because the program didn’t include her full answer to a question. That complaint was ridiculous, challenging the kind of editing that happens every day in the news business.

CBS would have won the case, but Trump had a huge advantage: His highly politicized Federal Communications Commission has been stalling on a merger of CBS parent Paramount with Skydance Media. It’s clear that Paramount’s controlling shareholder, Shari Redstone, decided to pay the ransom so Trump would stop holding the merger hostage.

It was a selfish, destructive act. Every surrender by the media encourages Trump to find new victims. It’s up to the public – which means you – to support news outlets that hold the line against Trump’s intimidation. Those outlets include the Associated Press, ProPublica, The New Republic, the Guardian US, The Atlantic, Wired, Meidas Touch, States Newsroom, Courier, and Rolling Stone, along with a variety of insightful newsletters.

Avoid news outlets that bend to Trump. In waving the white flag, CBS joins these other quislings of journalism:

ABC News

The network agreed to pay $15 million to Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos declaring that Trump had been found guilty of rape in the E. Jean Carroll civil case. Jurors found that Trump had sexually abused Carroll, but neither of two trials involved a finding of rape as it’s narrowly defined under New York law.

Even so, experts said ABC could have won the case. Trump is a public figure, so he would have had to prove that ABC acted with reckless disregard for the truth. That would’ve been a high bar, considering that a judge in the case said jurors did consider it rape “as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’”

But ABC settled. It was a sign of weakness that has encouraged more intimidation. Trump threatened to sue ABC again over its coverage of Qatar’s “gift” of a jetliner to serve as Air Force One. And ABC fired correspondent Terry Moran after his social media post criticizing Trump and adviser Stephen Miller caused the Trump regime to complain.

Washington Post

Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington Post, has sucked up to Trump in multiple ways, apparently fearful that the criminal president might sabotage his farflung businesses if he doesn’t play ball.

Bezos vetoed WaPo’s planned endorsement of Kamala Harris last year. He gave $1 million to Trump’s inauguration and sat in the row of oligarchs at the event. And Bezos’ Amazon is paying a $40 million licensing fee to produce a documentary on Melania Trump. Don't expect that film to be a hard-hitting investigation. In May, Trump and Bezos visited Saudi Arabia, where Bezos announced a $5 billion artificial intelligence project with the Saudis, who murdered and dismembered one of Bezos’ journalists, Jamal Khashoggi, seven years ago.

Bezos hired and is sticking with Will Lewis as WaPo’s publisher despite Lewis’ ties to Fox owner Rupert Murdoch’s phone hacking scandal in the United Kingdom.

Some WaPo news coverage seems independent and responsible. But Bezos’ actions eroding WaPo’s credibility have inspired an exodus of talent from the formerly respected newsroom.

Los Angeles Times

Patrick Soon-Shiong, a biotech entrepreneur who owns the Times, apparently wants to join the row of oligarchs with Bezos. He traveled to Saudi Arabia in May to chat with Trump and Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman.

Like Bezos, Soon-Shiong vetoed his staff’s plan to endorse Harris for president. As he tacks to the right, he has slammed his own news organization as “an echo chamber, not a trusted source.” He has speculated about using artificial intelligence to create alternative versions of articles to provide “both sides of that exact same story.”

He has also asked his editorial board to “take a break” from writing about Trump. Which is like asking a newspaper to avoid writing about the Category 5 hurricane that just hit.

These ideas have chased away talented LA Times staffers, as you can well imagine.

What about CNN?

CNN is on my quisling watch list. It hasn’t written a check or killed an endorsement to help Trump, but it does seem to avoid confrontation. Management chased off tough-on-Trump anchor Jim Acosta by threatening to transfer him to the overnight shift.

The network is desperately looking for middle ground where there is none. Media writer Oliver Darcy reported that top CNN journalists were instructed on inauguration eve that they should not (in Darcy’s words) ”re-litigate the past” regarding Trump. Darcy’s review of closed captioning from inauguration day found that no one on CNN used the terms “twice-impeached” or “convicted felon.”

And what about Fox, Newsmax, OAN, etc.?

These right-wing operations only pose as news outlets. They’re propagandists conspiring with Republicans to exploit racism, sexism, and fear to establish a criminal dictatorship. They’re not turncoats – they started out as enemies of democracy.

There’s a real danger that they become the norm – that all media become state media.

Support independent voices now. Shun the quislings. The truth can win out, with your help.

Share

What does the US produce?

 

What does the US produce? 

What does made in America mean these days? It often means its service sector — think finance, real estate, and healthcare services. In fact, services contributed over four times more to the nation’s GDP in 2024 than goods. 

  • In 2024, the US produced $29.2 trillion in goods and services, with $24.3 trillion (83.3%) coming from services and $4.9 trillion (16.7%) from goods. 

  • These financial figures are called “value added,” aka what these sectors contribute to the economy. (Read the article for more on how value added is calculated.) 

  • Finance, insurance, real estate, rental, and leasing accounted for $6.2 trillion (or 25.5%) of all service-based value. Professional and business services followed ($3.8 trillion), followed by educational services, healthcare, and social assistance ($2.5 trillion). 

  • Goods production is, of course, still crucial to the economy. The nation’s goods-producing industries are agriculture, mining, construction, and manufacturing. Manufacturing alone accounted for 59.8% of all US-produced goods, generating $2.9 trillion.

  • The top goods by value added were chemical products ranked first at $575.2 billion, then food, beverage, and tobacco products ($350.1 billion). Computer and electronic products ($308.3 billion) were third.
  • The US produced about seven times more goods and services than it imported in 2024 — $29.2 trillion compared to $4.1 trillion. In other words, for every $1 of value in imports, we produced a little over $7.

How to Turn the U.S. Into an Immigration Police State

 

Forwarded this email? Subscribe here for more

How to Turn the U.S. Into an Immigration Police State in One Big Bill

Medicaid cuts? Trillions in new debt? All immaterial, MAGA insists, as long as we get to jail the foreigners.

The Senate version of the Big Beautiful Bill is back in the House, where it’s set to get a chamber-wide vote today. Will they wave it through, or are we going to get another flurry of revisions and additions? We’ll see. Happy Wednesday.


President Donald Trump, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem tour “Alligator Alcatraz” in Ochopee, Florida on July 1, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)

United States of Alcatraz

by William Kristol

Will July 1, 2025 be a date that will live in infamy?

Probably not. There are too many competitors, too many other dates in recent months and years that have been signposts on our descent toward authoritarianism and indecency, too many other markers of national decline, for this one day to stand out all that much.

Still, yesterday packed quite a one-two punch.

The Senate passed a massive budget reconciliation bill that stands out, probably more than any other recent piece of legislation, for comforting the very comfortable while afflicting the afflicted. “Let’s not kid ourselves,” Alaska’s Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski hastened to say after the bill passed. It’s “not good enough” for our nation, and it’s the product of “an awful process—a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline.”

Of course Murkowski told us this after having cast the deciding vote for the bill.

In addition to cutting health care for the poor and providing tax relief for the rich, the legislation provided massive funding increases for the federal agencies carrying out the Trump administration’s anti-immigrant obsession. The bill adds a total of $170.7 billion to immigration enforcement. It roughly triples the annual detention and enforcement budgets for the masked men of Immigration and Customs Enforcement over the next four years.

And according to our vice president, JD Vance, this was the point of it all: “Everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.”

We believe politics should be welcoming, so you’re welcome to join our pro-democracy community. As always, if cost is an issue, just reach out to us and we’ll work it out.

All those people losing health insurance? “Minutiae.” “Immaterial.” Mass detention and deportation are what matters. They’re not only key to Making America Great Again, they’re what it means to Make America Great Again. That’s the MAGA dream: Finally getting rid of all those foreigners seeking refuge and opportunity here, in our land.

And mass detention and deportation are also key to advancing the other point of it all: authoritarianism. That’s the other part of the MAGA dream: Finally getting rid of all those annoying features of due process and the rule of law, all those restraints of civility and decency, that have kept us from doing what we want.

And so, while his vice president was breaking the tied vote in the Senate, Donald Trump was celebrating a new detention facility in the Florida Everglades. It’s a physical manifestation and apt symbol of the MAGA dream. How proud they all were of its clever name—“Alligator Alcatraz”—and the collection of tents filled with cages to hold immigrants.

The name is of course unfair to the original Alcatraz, a maximum-security, minimum-privilege penitentiary prison that operated from 1933 to 1963. That Alcatraz housed about 275 criminals convicted of serious crimes who were considered—and in many cases, had proven themselves—the most incorrigible inmates in the federal prison system.

Trump’s version of Alcatraz isn’t for a few hundred convicted and hardened criminals. It’s meant to hold thousands of undocumented immigrants, most of whom will have committed no crimes.

And there won’t be only one such facility. Trump was asked yesterday whether he wanted to see many more like it. His answer was straightforward: “Well, I think we’d like to see them in many states, really, many states. This one, I know [Florida Gov.] Ron [Desantis]’s doing a second one, at least a second one, and probably a couple of more. And, you know, at some point, they might morph into a system where you’re going to keep it for a long time.”

Massive detention facilities for immigrants convicted of no crime en route to their deportation to places they may have never been to: That’s the system Trump hopes we are going to keep for a long time.

Alcatraz—the real Alcatraz—was something we needed or thought we needed. Even the best nations need prisons. So far as I know, American presidents didn’t chortle about our prisons or hold them up as what America was all about. Alcatraz was an object of curiosity, a unique prison on an island in San Francisco Bay.

The island American presidents once touted as what America was all about is on the other coast. It’s called Liberty Island, and its most notable feature isn’t a prison. It’s been the home for almost a century and a half to a statue, the Statue of Liberty. Its official name is The Statue of Liberty Enlightening the World.

“Liberty enlightening the world.” How quaint. Do we still believe in that?

After yesterday, let’s not kid ourselves.

Share